Network Working Group Jon Postel
Request for Comments: 897 ISI
February 1984
Updates: RFC 881
Domain Name System Implementation Schedule
Status of this Memo
This memo is a policy statement on the implementation of the Domain
Style Naming System in the Internet. This memo is a partial update
of RFC 881. This is an official policy statement of the ICCB and the
DARPA.
The intent of this memo is to detail the schedule for the
implementation for the Domain Style Naming System. The explanation
of how this system works is to be found in the references.
The Current Situation
Simple Names
Hosts in the ARPA research and DDN operational communities are
currently assigned names in a flat or global name space of
character strings. There are some limits on these names. They
must start with a letter, end with a letter or digit and have only
letters or digits or hyphen as interior characters. Case is not
significant.
For example: USC-ISIF
Tables
Every host in the Internet is expected to have a way of
translating the name of any other host into its Internet address.
By and large, the name to address translation is done by looking
up the information in a table of all hosts.
The maintenance of this table is centralized at the Network
Information Center (NIC). Each host is expected to obtain a
current copy of the table on a timely basis.
Interface to the World
A great deal of mail moves between the Internet and other
"systems" that somehow transport mail among computers. This is
currently done by hiding some sort of "other-system" addressing
information in the local-part of the mail address and using a
mail-relay host in the host-part of the mailbox.
Postel [Page 1]
RFC 897 February 1984
Domain Implementation Schedule
For example,
OBERST%EDUCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS
EDMISTON.CIC@CSNET-RELAY
The Future Situation
Hierarchical Names
Because of the growth of the Internet, structured names (or domain
style names) will be used. Each element of the structured name
will be a character string (with the same constraints that
previously applied to the simple names).
For example: F.ISI.USC.ARPA
Servers
Every host in the Internet will be expected to have a way of
translating the name of any other host into its Internet address.
By and large, the name to address translation will be done by
interacting with a service. There will be a number of servers
that each hold a portion of the name to address information.
The maintenance of the translation data will be subdivided and
distributed.
There are several stages of implementation for the servers and
several levels of development for use of the domain style names.
First, there is the simple substitution of the domain style names
for the current host names, and the subdivision of these into
several domains. At this stage all domain style names directly
translate to host addresses and all domain style names have two
components.
For example: USC-ISIF.ARPA or USC-ISIA.DDN
and: Postel@USC-ISIF.ARPA or Kahn@USC-ISIA.DDN
Here we expect that "USC-ISIF.ARPA" is the name of an Internet
host and that we can send mail for "Postel" to the SMTP port on
that host. It may be that some backward host can still fake it
by ignoring the ".ARPA" and looking up an address for
"USC-ISIF".
Postel [Page 2]
RFC 897 February 1984
Domain Implementation Schedule
Using the domain name servers (but not the tables) mail
forwarding may be supported. A domain name server query can
say "I want to send mail to ABCDEF.ARPA". The response might
be "to send mail to ABCDEF.ARPA send it to the mail relay
GHIJKL.ARPA at address 123.123.123.123".
Second, there is an extension to more name components.
For example: F.ISI.USC.ARPA or A.USC-ISI.DDN
and: Postel@F.ISI.USC.ARPA or Kahn@A.USC-ISI.DDN
Here we expect that "F.ISI.USC.ARPA" is the name of an Internet
host and that we can send mail for "Postel" to the SMTP port on
that host. It is unlikely that a backward host can hack this
at all.
Third, there is an extension to domain style names that may
represent only organizations or administrative entities. Finding
a host that represents such entities may require a level of
indirection in the search.
For example: USC-ISI.ARPA or ARPA.DDN
and: Postel@USC-ISI.ARPA or Kahn@ARPA.DDN
Here we don't count on "USC-ISI.ARPA" being the name of an
Internet host. When we want to send mail to "Postel" we ask
the domain name server about sending mail to "USC-ISI.ARPA".
The server will tell us the name (and address) of a real
Internet host that handles mail on this organizations behalf,
for example, "F.USC-ISI.ARPA = 10.2.0.52". We then send mail
for "Postel" to the SMTP port on F.USC-ISI.ARPA.
Interface to the World
Mail will continue to move between the Internet and other
"systems". This may be done by designating some sort of
"other-system" representative organization in the domain server
data bases that can indirect mail to a mail-relay host.
For example,
OBERST@EDUCOM.MAILNET
EDMISTON@CIC.CSNET
Postel [Page 3]
RFC 897 February 1984
Domain Implementation Schedule
The Transition Situation
Actually, the situation is a bit more complicated, of course. A
number of hosts are already using domain style names under the
constraint that their domain style name is exactly their old style
name with the string ".ARPA" appended. The first transition step is
to have all hosts do this, and then to eliminate the user of old
style names altogether.
Please note carefully that two types of changes are being made:
One is a change in the support mechanism for translating a host
name to an internet address,
that is from using local copies of a full centrally maintained
table to dynamically accessing a distributed set of servers
each posesing a portion of a data base maintained in a
distributed fashion.
The other is a change in the host names themselves,
from a flat global space of unstructured strings to a
hierarchical structure of names.
There are four steps to the transition plan.
First, change from old names to domain style names.
host-name --> host-name.ARPA
Second, one domain to a few domains.
host-name.ARPA --> host-name.ARPA and host-name.DDN
Third, change from using central tables to using name servers.
Fourth, allow many domains.
There are two communities that are taking slightly different courses
in this transition. The ARPA research community is making the full
transition. The DDN operational community is making the change in
naming on the same schedule, but is not requiring hosts in the DDN
operational community make the change to using servers at the same
time (they can if they want to). The DDN PMO will establish a
schedule for that change at a later time. The NIC will maintain a
central table of all DDN operational hosts.
Postel [Page 4]
RFC 897 February 1984
Domain Implementation Schedule
Interface to the World
The interchange of mail with "other-systems" will have to continue
pretty much as it does now (except that RELAY-HOST will become
RELAY-HOST.ARPA) until organization names can be used. Then
representative organizations can be designated for each
"other-system" in the domain server data bases that will then
indirectly specify a mail-relay host.
Policy Statement
The names of hosts will be changed to domain style names. Hosts will
begin to use domain style names on 14-Mar-84 and the use of old style
names will be completely phased out before 2-May-84.
This applies to both the ARPA research hosts and the DDN operational
hosts.
Implication
All Hosts Change Names
The impact of introducing the domain style names is that all hosts
change their names at least once. Hosts that move to new domains
or subdomains may change their names several times.
Hosts have an official (or primary) name and possibly several
nicknames. When mail is sent from a host, the official name is
used in the mail header address fields.
Suppose, that in the old days before domains were thought of, a
host changed its name. What is the impact on users of changing
the name of a host? Suppose one host changed its name from FOO to
BAR.
Mail
Mail that was sent before the name was changed can not be
answered using mail program commands that automatically fill
in the return address. While it may be possible to use
special tricks to fix up the "From" or the "To" users
addresses, the "Cc" addresses are very difficult to correct.
Mail that was sent to JOE@ABC from FRED@FOO can not be
answered unless the change of name is known to the user or
the mail program an ABC and the host name BAR substituted
for FOO.
Postel [Page 5]
RFC 897 February 1984
Domain Implementation Schedule
Mail that is sent to JOE@ABC from SAM@DEF with a cc to
FRED@FOO can not be answered easily.
Mailing Lists
Any mailing lists that have mailboxes on the host that
changed names will now have incorrect entries.
The point is that while the host that changed names may be able to
use special tricks for a while to fix things up for the users, it
is difficult for other hosts to do this.
A general trick is to make the old name a nickname for the host
for some period of time.
The introduction of domain style names means that all hosts change
their names essentially at the same time.
For example, USC-ISIF changes to USC-ISIF.ARPA
To lessen the resulting havoc, the initial set of new names has a
fixed relationship to the old names. The first set of domain
style names is exactly the old names with the domain name "ARPA"
appended. That is, if a hosts old name was "HOST-NAME", then its
new name is "HOST-NAME.ARPA".
To further lessen the havoc, there will be a period of time when
both the old and the new names are allowed. That is, the old
names will be nicknames for a while.
Primary Names
In to old style names, host have an official or primary names and
may have several nicknames. For example,
Primary Name Nicknames
USC-ISIF ISIF
ADA-VAX ISI-VAXB AJPO VAXB
In any case, the data base in such than given any of the names for
a host one can find the address, and given the address one can
find the primary name.
In the new domain style name system this property must be
maintained. That is, given the Internet address of a host one
Postel [Page 6]
RFC 897 February 1984
Domain Implementation Schedule
must be able to find the primary name of that host. This calls
for careful management of the distributed database by those in
charge of the domains and subdomains.
The Time Table
-- Nov 83 Plan and Schedule
At this point the overall plan for the implementation of domain
style names and name servers, and a schedule of events was
published (RFC-881). Also the draft design and specification for
the protocol and data base were published (RFC-882, RFC-883).
-- Nov 83 Initial Domain Style Host Name Table
At this point a version of the host table which includes the
domain style names is made available (DHOSTS.TXT).
-- Feb 84 Domain Requirements Specification
At this point the requirements for establishing a new domain are
published as an RFC.
14 Mar 84 Begin using Domain Style Names
At this point all hosts should start using their domain style
names as their official and primary names. The standard table of
host names contains domain style names as the official and primary
name (DHOSTS.TXT becomes HOSTS.TXT).
04 Apr 84 Server for ARPA Domain
At this point several domain name servers are in operation to
supply host name to internet address translations, one of these
servers is at the NIC.
04 Apr 84 Domain Table
At this point a master table of top level domain names and their
associated servers is established at the NIC.
02 May 84 Stop using old style Names
At this point the use of old style names must be completely phased
out.
Postel [Page 7]
RFC 897 February 1984
Domain Implementation Schedule
02 May 84 Certain New Domains
At this point a few new domains may be established, in particular
the DDN domain.
06 Jun 84 General & Multilevel Domains
At this point additional new domains may be established, if they
meet the requirements. Domain style names may have more than two
segments.
18 Jul 84 Organizational Domains
Domain style names may identify organizations. Finding an address
for a host may involve a level of indirection.
05 Sep 84 Decommission Host Table
At this point the master host table maintained by the NIC need no
longer be complete for the ARPA research community. A full table
of the DDN operational hosts will be maintained by the NIC.
03 Oct 84 DDN Plan for Domains Name Service
At this point the DDN PMO will establish a plan for the future
support of name to address translations in the DDN community.
References
[1] Postel, J., "The Domain Names Plan and Schedule", RFC-881, USC
Information Sciences Institute, November 1983.
[2] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities",
RFC-882, USC Information Sciences Institute, November 1983.
[3] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and
Specification", RFC-883, USC Information Sciences Institute,
November 1983.
Postel [Page 8]
RFC, FYI, BCP