Network Working Group P. Deutsch
Request for Comments: 1835 BUNYIP INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Inc.
Category: Standards Track R. Schoultz
KTHNOC
P. Faltstrom
BUNYIP INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Inc.
C. Weider
BUNYIP INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Inc.
August 1995
Architecture of the WHOIS++ service
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This document describes WHOIS++, an extension to the trivial WHOIS
service described in RFC 954 to permit WHOIS-like servers to make
available more structured information to the Internet. We describe
an extension to the simple WHOIS data model and query protocol and a
companion extensible, distributed indexing service. A number of
options have also been added such as the use of multiple languages
and character sets, more advanced search expressions, structured data
and a number of other useful features. An optional authentication
mechanism for protecting all or part of the associated WHOIS++
information database from unauthorized access is also described.
Table of Contents
Part I - WHOIS++ Overview ................................. 3
1.1. Purpose and Motivation .............................. 3
1.2. Basic Information Model ............................. 4
1.2.1. Changes to the current WHOIS Model ................ 5
1.2.2. Registering WHOIS++ servers ....................... 5
1.2.3. The WHOIS++ Search Selection Mechanism ............ 7
1.2.4. The WHOIS++ Architecture .......................... 7
1.3. Indexing in WHOIS++ ................................. 8
1.4. Getting Help ........................................ 9
1.4.1. Minimum HELP Required ............................. 9
1.5. Options and Constraints ............................. 10
1.6. Formatting Responses ................................ 10
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
1.7. Reporting Warnings and Errors ....................... 11
1.8. Privacy and Security Issues ......................... 11
Part II - WHOIS++ Implementation .......................... 12
2.1. The WHOIS++ interaction model ....................... 12
2.2. The WHOIS++ Command set ............................. 12
2.2.1. System Commands ................................... 13
2.2.1.1. The COMMANDS command ............................ 14
2.2.1.2. The CONSTRAINTS command ......................... 15
2.2.1.3. The DESCRIBE command ............................ 15
2.2.1.4. The HELP command ................................ 15
2.2.1.5. The LIST command ................................ 15
2.2.1.6. The POLLED-BY command ........................... 15
2.2.1.7. The POLLED-FOR command .......................... 16
2.2.1.8. The SHOW command ................................ 16
2.2.1.9. The VERSION command ............................. 16
2.2.2. The Search Command ................................ 16
2.2.2.1. Format of a Search Term ......................... 17
2.2.2.2. Format of a Search String ....................... 18
2.3. WHOIS++ Constraints ................................. 19
2.3.1. Required Constraints .............................. 20
2.3.2. Optional CONSTRAINTS .............................. 21
2.3.2.1. The SEARCH Constraint ........................... 22
2.3.2.2. The FORMAT Constraint ........................... 22
2.3.2.3. The MAXFULL Constraint .......................... 22
2.3.2.4. The MAXHITS Constraint .......................... 23
2.3.2.5. The CASE Constraint ............................. 23
2.3.2.6. The AUTHENTICATE Constraint ..................... 23
2.3.2.7. The NAME Constraint ............................. 23
2.3.2.8. The PASSWORD Constraint ......................... 23
2.3.2.9. The LANGUAGE Constraint ......................... 23
2.3.2.10. The INCHARSET Constraint ....................... 24
2.3.2.11. The IGNORE Constraint .......................... 24
2.3.2.12. The INCLUDE Constraint ......................... 24
2.4. Server Response Modes ............................... 24
2.4.1. Default Responses ................................. 25
2.4.2. Format of Responses ............................... 25
2.4.3. Syntax of a Formatted Response .................... 26
2.4.3.1. A FULL format response .......................... 26
2.4.3.2. ABRIDGED Format Response ........................ 27
2.4.3.3. HANDLE Format Response .......................... 27
2.4.3.4. SUMMARY Format Response ......................... 27
2.4.3.5. SERVERS-TO-ASK Response ......................... 28
2.4.4. System Generated Messages ......................... 28
2.5. Compatibility with Older WHOIS Servers .............. 29
3. Miscellaneous ......................................... 29
3.1. Acknowledgements .................................... 29
3.2. References .......................................... 29
3.3. Authors' Addresses .................................. 30
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
Appendix A - Some Sample Queries .......................... 31
Appendix B - Some sample responses ........................ 31
Appendix C - Sample responses to system commands .......... 33
Appendix D - Sample whois++ session ....................... 35
Appendix E - System messages .............................. 36
Appendix F - The WHOIS++ BNF Grammar ...................... 38
Appendix G - Description of Regular expressions ........... 40
1. Part I - WHOIS++ Overview
1.1. Purpose and Motivation
The current NIC WHOIS service [HARR85] is used to provide a very
limited directory service, serving information about a small number
of Internet users registered with the DDN NIC. Over time the basic
service has been expanded to serve additional information and similar
services have also been set up on other hosts. Unfortunately, these
additions and extensions have been done in an ad hoc and
uncoordinated manner.
The basic WHOIS information model represents each individual record
as a Rolodex-like collection of text. Each record has a unique
identifier (or handle), but otherwise is assumed to have little
structure. The current service allows users to issue searches for
individual strings within individual records, as well as searches for
individual record handles using a very simple query-response
protocol.
Despite its utility, the current NIC WHOIS service cannot function as
a general White Pages service for the entire Internet. Given the
inability of a single server to offer guaranteed response or
reliability, the huge volume of traffic that a full scale directory
service will generate and the potentially huge number of users of
such a service, such a trivial architecture is obviously unsuitable
for the current Internet's needs for information services.
This document describes the architecture and protocol for WHOIS++, a
simple, distributed and extensible information lookup service based
upon a small set of extensions to the original WHOIS information
model. These extensions allow the new service to address the
community's needs for a simple directory service, yet the extensible
architecture is expected to also allow it to find application in a
number of other information service areas.
Added features include an extension to the trivial WHOIS data model
and query protocol and a companion extensible, distributed indexing
service. A number of other options have also been added, like boolean
operators, more powerful search constraints and search methods, and
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
most specificly structured the data to make both the client and the
server part of the dialogue more stringent and parseable. An optional
authentication mechanism for protecting all or parts of the
associated WHOIS++ information database from unauthorized access is
also briefly described.
The basic architecture of WHOIS++ allows distributed maintenance of
the directory contents and the use of the WHOIS++ indexing service
for locating additional WHOIS++ servers. Although a general overview
of this service is included for completeness, the indexing extensions
are described in a separate paper.
1.2. Basic Information Model
The WHOIS++ service is centered in a recommendation to structure user
information around a series of standardized information templates.
Such templates consist of ordered sets of data elements (or
attribute-value pairs).
It is intended that adding such structured templates to a server and
subsequently identifying and searching them be simple tasks. The
creation and use of customized templates should also be possible with
little effort, although their use should be discouraged where
appropriate standardized templates exist.
We also offer methods to allow the user to constrain searches to
desired attributes or template types, in addition to the existing
commands for specifying handles or simple strings.
It is expected that the minimalist approach we have taken will find
application where the high cost of configuring and operating
traditional White Pages services can not currently be justified.
Also note that the architecture makes no assumptions about the search
and retrieval mechanisms used within individual servers. Operators
are free to use dedicated database formats, fast indexing software or
even provide gateways to other directory services to store and
retrieve information, if desired.
The WHOIS++ server simply functions as a known front end, offering a
simple data model and communicating through a well known port and
query protocol. The format of both queries and replies has been
structured to allow the use of client software for generating
searches and displaying the results. At the same time, some effort
has been made to keep responses at least to some degree readible by
humans, to ensure low entry cost and to ease debugging.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
The actual implemention details of an individual WHOIS++ search
engine are left to the imagination of the implementor and it is hoped
that the simple, extensible approach taken will encourage
experimentation and the development of improved search engines.
1.2.1. Changes to the current WHOIS Model
The current WHOIS service is based upon an extremely simple data
model. The NIC WHOIS database consists of a series of individual
records, each of which is identified by a single unique identifer
(the "handle"). Each record contains one or more lines of
information. Currently, there is no structure or implicit ordering of
this information, although by implication each record is concerned
with information about a single user or service.
We have implemented two basic changes to this model. First, we have
structured the information within the database as collections of data
elements, or simple attribute/value pairs. Each individual record
contains a specified ordered set of these data elements.
Secondly, we have introduced typing of the database records. In
effect, each record is based upon one of a specified set of
templates, each containing a finite and specified number of data
elements. This allow users to easily limit searches to specific
collections of information, such as information about users,
services, abstracts of papers, descriptions of software, and so on.
As a final extension, we require that each individual WHOIS++
database on the Internet be assigned a unique handle, analogous to
the handle associated with each database record.
The WHOIS++ database structure is shown in Fig. 1.
1.2.2. Registering WHOIS++ servers
We propose that individual database handles be registered through the
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (the IANA), ensuring their
uniqueness. This will allow us to specify each WHOIS++ entry on the
Internet as a unique pair consisting of a server handle and a record
handle.
A unique registered handle is preferable to using the host's IP
address, since it is conceivable that the WHOIS++ server for a
particular domain may move over time. If we preserve the unique
WHOIS++ handle in such cases we have the option of using it for
resource discovery and networked information retrieval (see [IIIR]
for a discussion of resource and discovery and support issues).
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
There are many ways of guaranteeing uniqueness of server handles; we
will discuss them in a separate paper.
We believe that organizing information around a series of such
templates will make it easier for administrators to gather and
maintain this information and thus encourage them to make such
information available. At the same time, as users become more
familiar with the data elements available within specific templates
they will be better able to specify their searches, leading to a more
useful service.
______________________________________________________________________
| |
| + Single unique WHOIS++ database handle |
| |
| _______ _______ _______ |
| handle3 |.. .. | handle6 |.. .. | handle9 |.. .. | |
| _______ | _______ | _______ | |
| handle2 |.. .. | handle5 |.. .. | handle8 |.. .. | |
| _______ | _______ | _______ | |
| handle1 |.. .. | handle4 |.. .. | handle7 |.. .. | |
| |.. .. | |.. .. | |.. .. | |
| ------- ------- ------- |
| Template Template Template |
| Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Fig.1 - Structure of a WHOIS++ database. |
| |
| Notes: - Entire database is identified by a single unique WHOIS |
| handle. |
| - Each record has a single unique handle and a specific set |
| of attributes, determined by the template type used. |
| - Each value associated with an attribute can be any ASCII |
| string up to a specified length. |
|______________________________________________________________________|
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
1.2.3. The WHOIS++ Search Selection Mechanism
The WHOIS++ search mechanism is intended to be extremely simple. A
search command consists of one or more search terms, with an optional
set of global constraints (specifiers that modify or control a
search).
Search terms allow the user to specify template type, attribute,
value or handle that any record returns must satisfy. Each search
term can have an optional set of local constraints that apply to only
that term.
A WHOIS++ database may be seen as a single rolodex-like collection of
typed records. Each term specifies a further constraint that the
selected set of output records must satisfy. Each term may thus be
thought of as performing a subtractive selection, in the sense that
any record that does not fulfil the term is discarded from the result
set. Boolean searches are possible by the use of AND, OR, NOT and
parenthesis.
1.2.4. The WHOIS++ Architecture
The WHOIS++ directory service has an architecture which is separated
into two components; the base level server, which is described in
this paper, and a indexing server. A single physical server can act
as both a base level server and an indexing server.
A base level server is one which contains only filled templates. An
indexing server is one which contains forward knowledge (q.v.) and
pointers to other indexing servers or base level servers.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
1.3. Indexing in WHOIS++
Indexing in WHOIS++ is used to tie together many base level servers
and index servers into a unified directory service.
Each base level server and index server which wishes to participate
in the unified directory service must generate "forward knowledge"
for the entries it contains. One type of forward knowledge is the
"centroid".
An example of a centroid is as follows: if a whois++ server contained
exactly three records, as follows:
Record 1 Record 2
Template: Person Template: Person
First-Name: John First-Name: Joe
Last-Name: Smith Last-Name: Smith
Favourite-Drink: Labatt Beer Favourite-Drink: Molson Beer
Record 3
Template: Domain
Domain-Name: foo.edu
Contact-Name: Mike Foobar
the centroid for this server would be
Template: Person
First-Name: Joe
John
Last-Name: Smith
Favourite-Drink:Beer
Labatt
Molson
Template: Domain
Domain-Name: foo.edu
Contact-Name: Mike
Foobar
An index server would then collect this centroid for this server as
forward knowledge.
Index servers can collect forward knowledge for any servers it
wishes. In effect, all of the servers that the index server knows
about can be searched with a single query to the index server; the
index server holds the forward knowledge along with pointers to the
servers it indexes, and can refer the query to servers which might
hold information which satisfies the query.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
Implementors of this protocol are strongly encouraged to incorporate
centroid generation abilities into their servers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
____ ____
top level | | | |
whois index | | | |
servers ---- ----
____ ____
first level | | | |
whois index | | | |
servers ---- ----
____ ____ ____
individual | | | | | |
whois servers | | | | | |
---- ---- ----
Fig. 2 - Indexing system architecture.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1.4. Getting Help
Another extension to the basic WHOIS service is the requirement that
all servers support at least a minimal set of help commands, allowing
users to find out information about both the individual server and
the entire WHOIS++ service itself. This is done in the context of the
new extended information model by defining two specific template
formats and requiring each server to offer at least one example of
each record using these formats. The operator of each WHOIS service
is therefor expected to have, as a minimum, a single example of
SERVICES and HELP records, which can be accessed through appropriate
commands.
1.4.1. Minimum HELP Required
Executing the command:
DESCRIBE
gives a brief information about the WHOIS++ server.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
Executing the command:
HELP
gives a brief description of the WHOIS++ service itself.
The text of both required helped records should contain pointers to
additional help subjects that are available.
Executing the command:
HELP
may give information on any topic.
1.5. Options and Constraints
The WHOIS++ service is based upon a minimal core set of commands and
controlling constraints. A small set of additional optional commands
and constraints can be supported. These would allow users to perform
such tasks as provide security options, modify the information
contents of a server or add multilingual support. The required set of
WHOIS++ commands are summarized in section 2.2. WHOIS++ constraints
are described in section 2.3. Optional constraints are described in
section 2.3.2.
1.6. Formatting Responses
The output returned by a WHOIS++ server is structured to allow
machine parsing and automated handling. Of particular interest in the
ability to return summary information about a search (without having
to return the entire results).
All output of searches will be returned in one of five output
formats, which will be one of FULL, ABRIDGED, HANDLE, SUMMARY or
SERVER-TO-ASK. Note that a conforming server is only required to
support the first four formats.
When available, SERVER-TO-ASK format is used to indicate that a
search cannot be completed but that one or more alternative WHOIS++
servers may be able to perform the search.
Details of each output format are specified in section 2.4.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
1.7. Reporting Warnings and Errors
The formatted response of WHOIS++ commands allows the encoding of
warning or error messages to simplify parsing and machine handling.
The syntax of output formats are described in detail in section 2.4,
and details of WHOIS++ warnings and error conditions are given in
Appendix E.
All system messages are numerical, but can be tagged with text. It is
the clients decision if the text is presented to the user.
1.8. Privacy and Security Issues
The basic WHOIS++ service was conceived as a simple, unauthenticated
information lookup service, but there are occasions when
authentication mechanisms are required. To handle such cases, an
optional mechanism is provided for authenticating each WHOIS++
transaction.
The current identified authentication mechanism is PASSWORD, which
uses simple password authentication. Any other scheme name used must
begin with the characters "X-" and should thus be regarded as
experimental and non-standard.
Note that the WHOIS++ authentication mechanism does not dictate the
actual authentication scheme used, it merely provides a framework for
indicating that a particular transaction is to be authenticated, and
the appropriate mechanisms to use. This mechanism is extensible and
individual implementors are free to add additional mechanisms.
This document includes a very simple authentication scheme where a
combination of username and password is sent together with the search
string so the server can verify that the user have access to the
information. Note that this is NOT by any means a method recommended
to secure the data itself because both password and information are
tranferred unencrypted over the network.
Given the unauthenticated nature that default services like white
pages services are, it is easy to either forget the implications of
this and just show all data to the public Internet, or think that
Internet is so dangerous that information is hidden from the Internet
so the whole idea of a global white pages service is lost. Therefore
the type of authentication scheme selected and the public nature of
the Internet environment must still be taken into consideration when
assessing the security and authentication of the information served.
A more detailed exposition on security is outside the scope of this
document.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
2. Part II - WHOIS++ Implementation
2.1. The WHOIS++ interaction model
A WHOIS++ server will normally listen for a TCP connections on the
allocated WHOIS++ port (although a WHOIS++ server can be accessed
over any TCP connection). Once a connection is established, the
server issues a banner message, and listens for input. The command
specified in this input is processed and the results returned
including an ending system message. If the optional HOLD constraint
has not been specified the connection is then terminated.
If the server supports the optional HOLD constraint, and this
constraint is specified as part of any command, the server continues
to listen on the connection for another line of input. This cycle
continues as long as the sender continues to append the required HOLD
constraint to each subsequent command.
At the same time, each server is permitted to set an optional timeout
value (which should be indicated in the response to the CONSTRAINTS
command). If set, the server is free to terminate an idle connection
at any time after this delay has passed with no input from the
client. If the server terminates the connection due to timeout, it
will be indicated by the system message. The timeout value is not
changeable by the client.
2.2. The WHOIS++ Command set
There are two types of WHOIS++ commands - system commands and the
WHOIS++ search command.
The WHOIS++ command set consists of a core set of required systems
commands, a single required search command and an set of optional
system commands which support features that are not required by all
servers. The set of required WHOIS++ system commands are listed in
Table I. Details of the allowable search terms for the search command
are included in Table II.
Each WHOIS++ command also allows the use of one or more controlling
constraints, when selected can be used to override defaults or
otherwise modify server behavior. There is a core set of constraints
that must be supported by all conforming servers. These include
SEARCH (which controls the type of search performed), FORMAT (which
determines the output format used) and MAXHITS (which determines the
maximum number of matches that a search can return).
These required constraints are summarized in Table III.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
An additional set of optional constraints are used to provide support
for different character sets, indicate the need and type of
authentication to perform on a transaction, and permit multiple
transactions during a single communications session. These optional
constraints are listed in Table IV.
It is possible, using the required COMMANDS and CONSTRAINTS system
commands, to query any WHOIS++ server for its list of supported
commands and constraints.
2.2.1. System Commands
System commands are commands to the server for information or to
control its operation. These include commands to list the template
types available from individual servers, to obtain a single blank
template of any available type, and commands to obtain the list of
valid commands and constraints supported on a server.
There are also commands to obtain the current version of the WHOIS++
protocol supported, to access a simple help subsystem, to obtain a
brief description of the service (which is intended, among other
things, to support the automated registration of the service by
yellow pages directory services). All of these commands are required
from a conforming WHOIS++ server.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short Long Form Functionality
----- --------- -------------
COMMANDS [ ':' HOLD ] list valid WHOIS++ commands
supported by this server
CONSTRAINTS [ ':' HOLD ] List valid constraints
supported by this server
DESCRIBE [ ':' HOLD ] Describe this server,
formating the response
using a standard
"Services" template
'?' HELP [ [':' ]] System help, using a "Help"
template
LIST [':' ] List templates supported
by this system
POLLED-BY [ ':' HOLD ] List indexing servers
that are know to track
this server
POLLED-FOR [ ':' HOLD ] List information about
what this server is
tracking for
SHOW [':' ] Show contents of templates
specified
VERSION [ ':' HOLD ] return current version of
the protocol supported.
Table I - Required WHOIS++ SYSTEM commands.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below follows a descriptions for each command. Examples of responses
to each command is in Appendix C.
2.2.1.1. The COMMANDS command
The COMMANDS command returns a list of commands that the server
supports. The response is formatted as a FULL response.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
2.2.1.2. The CONSTRAINTS command
The CONSTRAINTS command returns a list of constraints and the values
of those that the server supports. The response is formatted as a
FULL response, where every constraint is represented as a separate
record. The template name for these records is CONSTRAINT. No
attention is paid to handles. Each record has, as a minimum, the
following two fields:
- "Constraint", which contains the attribute name described -
"Default", which shows the default value for this constraint.
If the client is permitted to change the value of the constraint,
there is also:
- "Range" field, which contains a list of values that this
server supports, as a comma separated list; Or, if the range
is numerical, as a pair of numbers separated with a hyphen.
2.2.1.3. The DESCRIBE command
The DESCRIBE command gives a brief description about the server in a
"Services" template. The result is formatted as a FULL response.
2.2.1.4. The HELP command
The HELP command takes an optional argument as subject to get help
for.
2.2.1.5. The LIST command
The LIST command returns the name of the templates available on the
server. The answer is formatted FULL format response.
2.2.1.6. The POLLED-BY command
The POLLED-BY command returns a list of servers and the templates and
attribute names that those server polled as centroids from this
server. The format is in FULL format with two attributes, Template
and Field. Each of these is a list of names of the templates or
fields polled. An empty result means either that the server is not
polled by anyone, or that it doesn't support indexing.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
2.2.1.7. The POLLED-FOR command
The POLLED-FOR command returns a list of servers that this server has
polled, and the template and attribute names for each of those. The
answer is in FULL format with two attributes, Template and Field. An
empty result means either that the server is not polling anyone, or
that it doesn't support indexing.
2.2.1.8. The SHOW command
The SHOW command takes a template name as argument and returns
information about a specific template, formatted as a FULL response.
The answer is formatted as a blank template with the requested name.
2.2.1.9. The VERSION command
The output format is a FULL response containg a record with template
name VERSION. The record must have attribute name "Version", which
value is "1.0" for this version of the protocol. The record may also
have the additional fields "Program-Name" and "Program-Version" which
gives information about the server implementation if the server so
desires.
2.2.2. The Search Command
A search command consists of one or more search terms, which might
each have local constraints, followed by an optional colon with a set
of global search constraints.
Each attribute value in the WHOIS++ database is divided into one or
more words separated by whitespace. Each search term operates on
every word in the attribute value.
Two or more search terms may be combined with boolean operators AND,
OR or NOT (other than the implied AND between terms). The operator
AND has higher precedence than the operator OR, but this can be
changed by the use of parentheses.
Search constraints that apply to every search term are specified as
global constraints. Local constraints override global constraints for
the search term they are bound to. The search terms and the global
constraints are separated with a colon (':'). Additional global
constraints are appended to the end of the search command delimited
with a semicolon ';'.
If different search constraints can not be fulfilled, or the
combination of different search constraints is uncombinable, the
server may choose to ignore some constraints, but still do the search
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
and return some records.
The set of required constraints are summarized in Table III. The set
of optional constraints are summarized in Table IV.
As an option, the server may accept specifications for attributes for
either inclusion or exclusion from a reply. Thus, users could specify
-only- those attributes to return, or specific attributes to filter
out, thus creating custom views.
2.2.2.1. Format of a Search Term
Each search term consists of one of the following:
1) A search string, followed by an optional semicolon and set of
semicolon-separated local constraints.
2) A search term specifier (as listed in Table II), followed by a
'=', followed by a search string, an optional semicolon and a
set of semicolon-separate local constraints.
3) An abbreviated search term specifier, followed by a search
string, followed by an optional semicolon and set of
semicolon-separated local constraints.
4) A combination of attribute name, followed by '=', followed by
a search string, followed by an optional semicolon and set of
semicolon-separate local constraints.
If no term identifier is provided, then the search will be applied to
attribute values only. This corresponds to an identifier of VALUE.
If a SEARCH-ALL specifier is used then the search will be applied to
all template names, handles, attribute names and attribute values.
When the user specifies the search term using the form:
" = "
this is considered to be an ATTRIBUTE-VALUE search.
For discussion of the system reply format, and selecting the
appropriate reply format, see section 2.4.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Valid specifiers:
-----------------
Name Functionality
---- -------------
ATTRIBUTE-VALUE [ ';' ]* allows combining
attribute and value
specifiers in one term.
HANDLE [ ';' ]* Confine search to handles.
SEARCH-ALL [ ';' ]* Search everything.
TEMPLATE [ ';' ]* Confine search to
template names.
VALUE [ ';' ]* Confine search to attribute
values. This is the default.
(Note: The name HANDLE can be replaced with the shortname '!')
Acceptable forms of a search specifier:
---------------------------------------
1) [';' ]*
2) = [';' ]*
3) [';' ]*
4) = [';' ]*
(Note: A is a name of a valid local constraint.)
Table II - Valid search command term specifiers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2.2.2.2. Format of a Search String
Special characters that need to be quoted are preceeded by a
backslash, '\'.
Special characters are space ' ', tab, equal sign '=', comma ',',
colon ':', backslash '\', semicolon ';', asterisk '*', period '.',
parenthesis '()', square brackets '[]', dollar sign '$' and
circumflex '^'.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
If the search term is given in some other character set than ISO-
8859-1, it must be specified by the constraint INCHARSET.
2.3. WHOIS++ Constraints
Constraints are intended to be hints or recommendations to the server
about how to process a command. They may also be used to override
default behaviour, such as requesting that a server not drop the
connection after performing a command.
Thus, a user might specify a search constraint as "SEARCH=exact",
which means that the search engine is to perform an exact match
search. It might also specify "LANGUAGE=Fr", which implies that the
server should use French in fuzzy matches. It might also be able to
issue system messages in French.
In general, contraints take the form "=", with
being one of a specified set of valid values. The notable
exception is "HOLD", which takes no argument.
All constraints can be used as a global constraint, but only a few
can be used as local. See tables IV and V for information of which
constraints can be local.
The CONSTRAINTS system command is used to list the search constraints
supported by an individual server.
If a server cannot satisfy the specified constraint there will be a
mechanism for informing the user in the reply, using system messages.
In such cases, the search is still performed, with the the server
ignoring unsupported constraints.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
2.3.1. Required Constraints
The following CONSTRAINTS must be supported in all conforming WHOIS++
servers.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Format LOCAL/GLOBAL
------ -------------
SEARCH= {exact | lstring } LOCAL/GLOBAL
FORMAT= {full | abridged | handle | summary } GLOBAL
MAXHITS= { 1- } GLOBAL
Table III - Required WHOIS++ constraints.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
2.3.2. Optional CONSTRAINTS
The following CONSTRAINTS and constraint values are not required of a
conforming WHOIS++ server, but may be supported. If supported, their
names and supported values must be returned in the response to the
CONSTRAINTS command.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Format LOCAL/GLOBAL
------ -------------
SEARCH= { regex | fuzzy | substring | } LOCAL/GLOBAL
CASE= { ignore | consider } LOCAL/GLOBAL
FORMAT= { server-to-ask | } GLOBAL
MAXFULL= { 1- } GLOBAL
AUTHENTICATE= password GLOBAL
NAME= GLOBAL
PASSWORD= GLOBAL
INCHARSET= { us-ascii | iso-8859-* } GLOBAL
LANGUAGE= GLOBAL
HOLD GLOBAL
IGNORE= {attributelist} GLOBAL
INCLUDE= {attributelist} GLOBAL
Table IV - Optional WHOIS++ constraints.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
2.3.2.1. The SEARCH Constraint
The SEARCH constraint is used for specifying the method that is to be
used for the search. The default method is "exact". Following is a
definition of each search method.
exact The search will succeed for a word that exactly
matches the search string.
substring The search will succeed for a word that matches
a part of a word.
regex The search will succeed for a word when a regular
expression matches the searched data. Regular
expression is built up by using constructions of
'*', '.', '^', '$', and '[]'. For use of
regular expressions see Appendix G.
fuzzy The search will succeed for words that matches the
search string by using an algorithm designed to catch
closely related names with different spelling, e.g.
names with the same pronounciation. The server
chooses which algorithm to use, but it may vary
depending on template name, attribute name and
language used (see Constraint Language above).
lstring The search will succed for words that begins
with the search string.
2.3.2.2. The FORMAT Constraint
The FORMAT constraint describes what format the result will be in.
Default format is FULL. For a description of each format, see Server
Response Modes below.
2.3.2.3. The MAXFULL Constraint
The MAXFULL constraint sets the limit of the number of matching
records the server allows before it enforces SUMMARY responses. The
client may attempt to override this value by specifying another value
to that constraint. Example: If, for privacy reasons, the server will
return the response in SUMMARY format if the number of hits exceeds
2, the MAXFULL constraint is set to 2 by the server.
Regardless of what format the client did or did not ask for, the
server will change the response format to SUMMARY when the number of
matching records equals or exceeds this value.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
2.3.2.4. The MAXHITS Constraint
The MAXHITS constraint sets the maximum number of records the client
can get in a search respone.
2.3.2.5. The CASE Constraint
The CASE constraint defines if the search should be done case
sensistive or not. Default value is to have case ignored.
2.3.2.6. The AUTHENTICATE Constraint
The AUTHENTICATE constraint describes which authentication method to
use when executing the search. By using a specific authentication
method, some other constraints might be needed which is specified by
the authentication method.
The only authentication method described in this document is
"password", if used, also the two other constraints "name" and
"password" need to be set.
2.3.2.7. The NAME Constraint
The NAME constraint is only used together with some authentication
method named by the constraint "authenticate". The only use described
in this document is by sending a username as a string of characters
which together with the string given as an argument to the "password"
constraint is sent to the server. The server can use that pair of
strings to do a simple authentication check, similar to the UNIX
login program.
2.3.2.8. The PASSWORD Constraint
The PASSWORD constraint is only used together with some
authentication method named by the constraint "authenticate". The
only use described in this document is by sending a password as a
string of characters which together with the string given as an
argument to the "name" constraint is sent to the server. The server
can use that pair of strings to do a simple authentication check,
similar tothe UNIX login program.
2.3.2.9. The LANGUAGE Constraint
The LANGUAGE constraints can be used as an extra information to the
fuzzy matching search method, and it might also be used to tell the
server to give the system responses in another language, although
this ability should be handled by the client. The language code
defined in RFC 1766 [ALVE95] can be used as a value for the language
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
constraint. In these, the case of the letters are insignigicant.
2.3.2.10. The INCHARSET Constraint
The INCHARSET constraint tells the server in which character set the
search string itself is given in. The default character set is ISO-
8859-1.
2.3.2.11. The IGNORE Constraint
The IGNORE constraint specifies which attributes to NOT include in
the result. All other attributes will be included (as if named
explicitly by the "include" constraint).
If an attribute is named both with the "include" and "ignore"
constraint, the attribute is to be included in the result, but the
system message must be "% 205 Requested constraint not fulfilled".
2.3.2.12. The INCLUDE Constraint
The INCLUDE constraint specifies which attributes to include in the
result. All other attributes will be excluded (as if named explicitly
by the "ignore" constraint).
If an attribute is named both with the "include" and "ignore"
constraint, the attribute is to be included in the result, but the
system message must be "% 205 Requested constraint not fulfilled".
2.4. Server Response Modes
There are currently a total of five different response modes possible
for WHOIS++ servers. These are FULL, ABRIDGED, HANDLE, SUMMARY and
SERVER-TO-ASK. The syntax of each output format is specified in more
detail in the following section.
1) A FULL format response provides the complete contents of a
template matching the specified query, including the template
type, the server handle and an optional record handle.
2) An ABRIDGED format response provides a brief summary, including
(as a minimum) the server handle, the corresponding record handle
and relevant information for that template.
3) A HANDLE format response returns a line with information about
the server handle and record handle for a record that matched
the specified query.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
4) A SUMMARY response provides only a brief summary of information
the number of matches and the list of template types in which the
matches occured.
5) A SERVER-TO-ASK response only returns pointers to other index
servers which might possibly be able to answer the specified
query.
The server may respond with a null answer and may also respond with a
null answer together with a correct system message to indicate that
the query was too complex.
2.4.1. Default Responses
By default, a WHOIS++ server will provide FULL responses. This may be
changed by the client with the use of the global constraint "format".
The server is allowed to provide response in SUMMARY format if the
number of hits exceeds the value of the global constraint "maxfull".
The server will not respond with more matches than the value
specified with the global constraint "maxhits"; Not in any response
format. If the number of matches exceeds this value, the server will
issues the system message 110 (maxhits value exceeded), but will
still show the responses, up to the number of the "maxhits"
constraint value. This mechanism will allow the server to hide the
number of possible matches to a search command.
The server response modes are summarized in Table V.
2.4.2. Format of Responses
Each response consists of a numerical system generated message, which
can be tagged with text, followed by an optional formatted response
message, followed by a second system generated messages.
That is:
'%'
[ ]
'%'
If there are no matches to a query, the system is not required to
generate any output as a formatted response, although it must still
generate system messages.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
For information about the format for system messages, see Appendix E.
2.4.3. Syntax of a Formatted Response
All formatted responses except for the HANDLE response, consists of a
response-specific START line, followed by an optional response-
specific data section, followed by a TERMINATION line. The HANDLE
response is different in that it only consists of a START line. It
is permissible to insert any number of lines consisting solely of
newlines within a formatted response to improve readibility.
Each line shall be limited to no more than 81 characters, including
the terminating newline. If a line (including the required leading
single space) would exceed 81 characters, it is to be broken into
lines of no more than 81 characters, with each continuation line
beginning with a "+" character in the first column instead of the
leading character.
If an attribute value in a data section includes a line break, the
line break must be replaced by a CR/LF pair and the following line
begin with a "-" character in the first column, instead of the
leading character. The attribute name is not repeated on consecutive
lines.
A TERMINATION line consists of a line with a '#' in the first column,
followed by one white space character (SPACE or TAB), followed by the
keyword END, followed by zero or more characters, followed by a
newline.
A response-specific section will be one of the following:
1) FULL Format Response
2) ABRIDGED Format Response
3) HANDLE Format Response
4) SUMMARY Format Response
5) SERVER-TO-ASK Format Response
The details of each are specified in the following sections:
2.4.3.1. A FULL format response
A FULL format response consists of a series of responses, each
consisting of a START line, followed by the complete template
information for the matching record and a TERMINATION line.
Each START line consists of a '#' in the first column, followed by
one white space character, the word "FULL", a white space character,
the name of the corresponding template type, one white space
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
character, the server handle, a white space character, an optional
handle for the record, and a terminating newline.
The template information for the record will be returned as a series
of lines consisting of a single space, followed by the corresponding
line of the record.
The line of the record shall consist of a single space and the
attribute name followed by a ':', a single space, the value of that
attribute, and a newline.
2.4.3.2. ABRIDGED Format Response
Each ABRIDGED format response consists of a START line, a single line
excerpt of the template information from each matching record and a
TERMINATION line. The excerpt information shall include information
that is relevant to the template type.
The START line consists of a '#' in the first column, followed by one
white space character, the word "ABRIDGED", a white space character,
the name of the corresponding template type, a white space character,
the server handle, a white space character, the handle for the
record, and a terminating newline.
The abridged template information will be returned as a line,
consisting of a single space, followed by the abridged line of the
record and a newline pair.
2.4.3.3. HANDLE Format Response
A HANDLE response consists of a single START line, which shall start
with a '#' in the first column, followed by one white space
character, the word "HANDLE", a white space character, the name of
the corresponding template, a white space character, the handle for
the server, a white space character, the handle for that record, and
a terminating newline.
2.4.3.4. SUMMARY Format Response
A SUMMARY format response consists of a single set of responses,
consisting of a line listing the number of matches to the specified
query, followed by a list of all template types which satisfied the
query at least once.
The START line shall begin with a '#' in the first column, be
followed by one white space character, the word "SUMMARY", a white
space character, the handle for the server, and a terminating
newline.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
All following lines until the TERMINATION line starts with a leading
space. The first line shall begin with the string "matches: ", be
followed by a space and the number of responses to the query and
terminated by a newline. The second line shall begin with the string
"templates: ", be followed by a newline separated list of the name of
the template types which matched the query. Each line following the
first which include the text "templates:" must begin with a '-'
instead of a space.
2.4.3.5. SERVER-TO-ASK Response
A SERVER-TO-ASK response consists of information to the client about
a server to contact next to resolve a query. If the server has
pointers to more than one server, it will present additional SERVER-
TO-ASK responses.
The SERVER-TO-ASK response will consist of a START line and a number
of lines with attribute-value pairs, separated by CRLF. Each line is
indented with one space. The end of a SERVER-TO-ASK response is
indicated with a TERMINATION line.
Each START line consists of a '#' in the first column, followed by
one white space character, the word "SERVER-TO-ASK", a white space
character, the handle of the server and a terminating newline.
1. "Server-Handle" - The server handle of the server pointed at.
(req.)
2. "Host-Name" - A cached host named for the server pointed at. (opt.)
3. "Host-Port" - A cached port number for the server pointed at.
(opt.)
Other attributes may be present, depending on the index server.
2.4.4. System Generated Messages
All system generated messages must begin with a '%' as the first
character, a space as the second one, followed by a three digit
number, a space and an optional text message. The total length of the
line must be no more than 81 characters long, including the
terminating CR LF pair. There is no limit to the number of system
messages that may be generated.
The format for multiline replies requires that every line, except the
last, begin with "%", followed by space, the reply code, a hyphen,
and an optional text. The last line will begin with "%", followed by
space, the reply code, a space and some optional text.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
System generated messages displayed before or after the formatted
response section are expected to refer to operation of the system or
refer to the entire query. System generated messages within the
output of an individual record during a FULL reponse are expected to
refer to that record only, and could (for example) be used to
indicate problems with that record of the response. See Appendix E
for a description of system messages.
2.5. Compatibility with Older WHOIS Servers
Note that this format, although potentially more verbose, is still in
a human readible form. Responses from older systems that do not
follow this format are still conformant, since their responses would
be interpreted as being equivalent to optional text messages, without
a formatted response. Clients written to this specification would
display the responses as a advisory text message, where it would
still be readible by the user.
3. Miscellaneous
3.1. Acknowledgements
The WHOIS++ effort began as an intensive brainstorming session at the
24th IETF, in Boston Massachusetts. Present at the birth, and
contributing ideas through this early phase, were (alphabetically)
Peter Deutsch, Alan Emtage, Jim Fullton, Joan Gargano, Brad
Passwaters, Simon Spero, and Chris Weider. Others who have since
helped shape this document with feedback and suggestions include
Roxana Bradescu, Patrik Faltstrom, Kevin Gamiel, Dan Kegel, Michael
Mealling, Mark Prior and Rickard Schoultz.
3.2 References
[ALVE95] Alvestrand H., "Tags for the Identification of
Languages", RFC 1766, UNINETT, March 1995.
[HARR85] Harrenstein K., Stahl M., and E. Feinler,
"NICNAME/WHOIS", RFC 954, SRI, October 1985.
[IIIR] Weider C., and P. Deutsch, "A Vision of an
Integrated Internet Information Service", RFC 1727
Bunyip Information Systems, Inc., December 1994.
[POST82] Postel J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10,
RFC 821, USC/Information Sciences Institute,
August 1982.
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
3.3. Authors' Addresses
Peter Deutsch
BUNYIP INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Inc.
310 St-Catherine St West,
Suite 202,
Montreal, Quebec H2X 2A1
CANADA
EMail: peterd@bunyip.com
Rickard Schoultz
KTHNOC, SUNET/NORDUnet/Ebone Operations Centre
100 44 STOCKHOLM
SWEDEN
EMail: schoultz@sunet.se
Patrik Faltstrom
BUNYIP INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Inc.
310 St-Catherine St West,
Suite 202,
Montreal, Quebec H2X 2A1
CANADA
EMail: paf@bunyip.com
Chris Weider
BUNYIP INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Inc.
2001 S. Huron Parkway, #12
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
USA
EMail: clw@bunyip.com
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
Appendix A - Some Sample Queries
author=chris and template=user
The result will consist of all records where attribute "author"
matches "chris" with case ignored. Only USER templates will be
searched. An example of a matching record is "Author=Chris Weider".
This is the typical case of search.
schoultz and rick;search=lstring
The result will consist of all records which have one attribute value
matching "schoultz" exactly and one having "rick" as leading
substring, both with case ignored. One example is "Name=Rickard
choultz".
value=phone;search=substring
The result will consist of all records which have attribute values
matching *phone*, for example the record "Name=Acme telephone inc.",
but will not match the attribute name "phone". (Since "value" term
specifier is the default, the search term could be "phone" as well as
"value=phone".)
search-all=Peter ; search=substring;case=consider
The result will consist of all records which have attribute names,
template names or attribute values matching "Peter" with respect to
case. One example is "Friend-Of-Peter: Yes".
ucdavis;search=substring and (gargano or joan):include=name,email
This search command will find records which have records containing
the words "gargano" or "joan" somewhere in the record, and has the
word "ucdavis" somewhere in a word. The result will only show the
"name" and "email" fields.
Appendix B - Some sample responses
1) FULL format responses:
# FULL USER SERVERHANDLE1 PD45
Name: Peter Deutsch
email: peterd@bunyip.com
# END
# FULL USER SERVERHANDLE1 AE1
Name: Alan Emtage
email: bajan@bunyip.com
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
# END
# FULL USER SERVERHANDLE1 NW1
Name: Nick West
Favourite-Bicycle-Forward-Wheel-Brand: New Bicy
+cles Acme Inc.
email: nick@bicycle.acme.com
My-favourite-song: Happy birthday to you!
-Happy birthday to you!
-Happy birthday dear Nick!
-Happy birthday to you.
# END
# FULL SERVICES SERVERHANDLE1 WWW1
Type: World Wide Web
Location: the world
# END
--------------------
2) An ABRIDGED format response:
# ABRIDGED USER SERVERHANDLE1 PD45
Peter Deutsch peterd@bunyip.com
# END
# ABRIDGED USER SERVERHANDLE1 AE1
Alan Emtage bajan@bunyip.com
# END
# ABRIDGED USER SERVERHANDLE1 WWW1
World Wide Web the world
# END
--------------------
3) HANDLE format responses:
# HANDLE USER SERVERHANDLE1 PD45
# HANDLE USER SERVERHANDLE1 AE1
# HANDLE SERVICES SERVERHANDLE1 WWW1
--------------------
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
4) A SUMMARY HANDLE format response:
# SUMMARY SERVERHANDLE1
Matches: 175
Templates: User
- Services
- Abstracts
# END
Appendix C - Sample responses to system commands
C.1 Response to the LIST command
# FULL LIST SERVERHANDLE1
Templates: USER
-SERVICES
-HELP
# END
C.2 Response to the SHOW command
This example shows the result after issuing "show user":
# FULL USER SERVERHANDLE1
Name:
Email:
Work-Phone:
Organization-Name:
City:
Country:
# END
C.3 Response to the POLLED-BY command
# FULL POLLED-BY SERVERHANDLE1
Server-handle: serverhandle2
Cached-Host-Name: sunic.sunet.se
Cached-Host-Port: 7070
Template: USER
Field: ALL
# END
# FULL POLLED-BY SERVERHANDLE1
Server-handle: serverhandle3
Cached-Host-Name: kth.se
Cached-Host-Port: 7070
Template: ALL
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
Field: Name,Email
# END
C.4 Response to the POLLED-FOR command
# FULL POLLED-FOR SERVERHANDLE1
Server-Handle: serverhandle5
Template: ALL
Field: Name,Address,Job-Title,Organization-Name,
+Organization-Address,Organization-Name
# END
# FULL POLLED-FOR SERVERHANDLE1
Server-Handle: serverhandle4
Template: USER
Field: ALL
# END
C.5 Response to the VERSION command
# FULL VERSION BUNYIP.COM
Version: 1.0
Program-Name: kth-whoisd
Program-Version: 2.0
# END
C.6 Response to the CONSTRAINTS command
# FULL CONSTRAINT COMEDIA.SE
Constraint: format
Default: full
Range: full,abridged,summary,handle
# END
# FULL CONSTRAINT COMEDIA.SE
Constraint: maxhits
Default: 200
Range: 1-1000
# END
# FULL CONSTRAINT COMEDIA.SE
Constraint: search
Default: exact
Range: exact,substring,lstring
# END
# FULL CONSTRAINT COMEDIA.SE
Constraint: maxfull
Default: 20
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
# END
C.3 Response to the COMMANDS command
# FULL COMMANDS SERVERHANDLE1
Commands: commands
-constraints
-describe
-help
-list
-polled-by
-polled-for
-show
-version
# END
Appendix D - Sample whois++ session
Below is an example of a session between a client and a server. The
angle brackets to the left is not part of the communication, but is
just put there to denonte the direction of the communication between
the server or the client. Text appended to '>' means messages from
the server and '<' from the client.
Client connects to the server
>% 220-Welcome to
>% 220-the whois++ server
>% 220 at ACME inc.
% 200 Command okay
>
># FULL USER ACME.COM NW1
> name: Nick West
> email: nick@acme.com
># END
># SERVER-TO-ASK ACME.COM
> Server-Handle: SUNETSE01
> Host-Name: whois.sunet.se
> Host-Port: 7070
># END
># SERVER-TO-ASK ACME.COM
> Server-Handle: KTHSE01
># END
>% 226 Tranfer complete
% 200 Command okay
># FULL VERSION ACME.COM
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
> Version: 1.0
># END
>% 226 Tranfer complete
>% 203 Bye
Server closes the connection
In the example above, the client connected to a whois++ server and
queried for all records where the attribute "name" equals "Nick", and
asked the server not to close the connection after the response by
using the global constraint "HOLD".
The server responds with one record and a pointer to two other
servers that either holds records or pointers to other servers.
The client continues with asking for the servers version number
without using the HOLD constraint. After responding with protocol
version, the server closes the connection.
Note that each response from the server begins system message 200
(Command OK), and ends with system message 226 (Transfer Complete).
Appendix E - System messages
A system message begins with a '%', followed by a space and a three
digit number, a space, and an optional text message. The line message
must be no more than 81 characters long, including the terminating CR
LF pair. There is no limit to the number of system messages that may
be generated.
A multiline system message have a hyphen instead of a space in column
6, immediately after the numeric response code in all lines, except
the last one, where the space is used.
Example 1
% 200 Command okay
Example 2
% 220-Welcome to
% 220-the whois++ server
% 220 at ACME inc.
The client is not expected to parse the text part of the response
message except when receiving reply 600, in which case the text part
is the name of a character set that will be used by the server in the
rest of the response. The valid values for characters sets is
specified in the "characterset" list in the BNF listing in Appendix
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
F.
The theory of reply codes is described in Appendix E in STD 10, RFC
821 [POST82].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of system response codes
------------------------------
110 Too many hits The number of matches exceeded
the value specified by the
maxhits constraint. Server
will still reply with as many
records as "maxhits" allows.
111 Requested constraint not supported One or more constraints in
query is not implemented, but
the search is still done.
112 Requested constraint not fullfilled One or more constraints in
query has unacceptable value
and was therefore not used,
but the search is still done.
200 Command Ok Command accepted and executed.
The client must wait for a
transaction end system message.
201 Command Completed successfully Command accepted and executed.
203 Bye Server is closing connection
220 Service Ready Greeting message. Server is
accepting commands.
226 Transaction complete End of data. All responses to
query are sent.
430 Authentication needed Client requested information
that needs authentication.
500 Syntax error
502 Search expression too complicated This message is sent when the
server is not able to resolve
a query (i.e. when a client
sent a regular expression that
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
is too deeply nested).
530 Authentication failed The authentication phase
failed.
600 Subsequent attribute values
are encoded in the charater
set specified by .
Table V - System response codes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix F - The WHOIS++ BNF Grammar
whois-command = ( system-command [":" "hold"]
/ terms [":" globalcnstrnts] ) NL
system-command = "constraints"
/ "describe"
/ "commands"
/ "polled-by"
/ "polled-for"
/ "version"
/ "list"
/ "show" [1*SP string]
/ "help" [1*SP string]
/ "?" [string]
terms = and-expr *("or" and-expr)
and-expr = not-expr *("and" not-expr)
not-expr = ["not"] (term / ( "(" terms ")" ))
term = generalterm / specificterm
/ shorthandle / combinedterm
generalterm = string *(";" localcnstrnt)
specificterm = specificname "=" string
*(";" localcnstrnt)
specificname = "handle" / "value"
shorthandle = "!" string *(";" localcnstrnt)
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
combinedterm = string "=" string *(";" localcnstrnt)
globalcnstrnts = globalcnstrnt *(";" globalcnstrnt)
globalcnstrnt = localcnstrnt
/ "format" "=" format
/ "maxfull" "=" 1*digit
/ "maxhits" "=" 1*digit
/ opt-globalcnst
opt-globalcnst = "hold"
/ "authenticate" "=" auth-method
/ "name" "=" string
/ "password" "=" string
/ "language" "=" language
/ "incharset" "=" characterset
/ "ignore" "=" string
/ "include" "=" string
format = "full" / "abridged" / "handle" / "summary"
/ "server-to-ask"
language =
characterset = "us-ascii" / "iso-8859-1" / "iso-8859-2" /
"iso-8859-3" / "iso-8859-4" / "iso-8859-5" /
"iso-8859-6" / "iso-8859-7" / "iso-8859-8" /
"iso-8859-9" / "iso-8859-10" / "utf-8" /
charset-value
charset-value = 1*char
localcnstrnt = "search" "=" searchvalue /
"case" "=" casevalue
searchvalue = "exact" / "substring" / "regex" / "fuzzy"
/ "lstring"
casevalue = "ignore" / "consider"
auth-method = "password"
string = 0*char
char = "\" specialchar
/
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
specialchar = " " / / "=" / "," / ":" / ";" / "\" /
"*" / "." / "(" / ")" / "[" / "]" / "^" /
"$" / "!" / "?"
digit = "0" / "1" / "2" / "3" / "4" /
"5" / "6" / "7" / "8" / "9"
NL =
NOTE: Significant blanks must be escaped. The following
characters, when significant to the query, may be preceded
and/or followed by a single blank:
: ; , ( ) = !
Appendix G - Description of Regular expressions
The regular expressions described in this section is the same as used
in many other applications and operating systems. It is though very
simple and does not include logical operators AND and OR.
Searches using regular expressions are always using substring
matching except when the regular expression contains the characters
'^' or '$'.
Character Function
--------- --------
Matches itself
. Matches any character
a* Matches zero or more 'a'
[ab] Matches 'a' or 'b'
[a-c] Matches 'a', 'b' or 'c'
^ Matches beginning of
a token
$ Matches end of a token
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 1835 Architecture of the WHOIS++ service August 1995
Examples
---------
String Matches Matches not
------- ------- -----------
hello xhelloy heello
h.llo hello helio
h.*o hello helloa
h[a-f]llo hello hgllo
^he.* hello ehello
.*lo$ hello helloo
Deutsch, et al Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC, FYI, BCP