Network Working Group R. Steinberger
Request for Comments: 3201 Paradyne Networks
Category: Standards Track O. Nicklass
RAD Data Communications Ltd.
January 2002
Definitions of Managed Objects
for Circuit to Interface Translation
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo defines an extension of the Management Information Base
(MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based
internets. In particular, it defines objects for managing the
insertion of interesting Circuit Interfaces into the ifTable. This
is important for circuits that must be used within other MIB modules
which require an ifEntry. It allows for integrated monitoring of
circuits as well as routing to circuits using unaltered, pre-existing
MIB modules.
Table of Contents
1. The SNMP Management Framework ............................... 2
2. Conventions ................................................. 3
3. Overview .................................................... 3
3.1. Circuit Concepts .......................................... 4
3.2. Theory of Operation ....................................... 4
3.2.1. Creation Process ........................................ 4
3.2.2. Destruction Process ..................................... 5
3.2.2.1. Manual Row Destruction ................................ 5
3.2.2.2. Automatic Row Destruction ............................. 5
3.2.3. Modification Process .................................... 5
3.2.4. Persistence of Data ..................................... 5
4. Relation to Other MIB Modules ............................... 6
4.1. Frame Relay DTE MIB ....................................... 6
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
4.2. Frame Relay Service MIB ................................... 6
4.3. ATM MIB ................................................... 6
4.4. Interfaces Group MIB ...................................... 6
4.4.1. Interfaces Table (ifTable, ifXtable) .................... 6
4.4.2. Stack Table (ifStackTable) .............................. 9
4.5. Other MIB Modules ......................................... 11
5. Structure of the MIB Module ................................. 11
5.1. ciCircuitTable ............................................ 11
5.2. ciIfMapTable .............................................. 11
6. Object Definitions .......................................... 11
7. Acknowledgments ............................................. 19
8. References .................................................. 19
9. Security Considerations ..................................... 21
10. IANA Considerations ........................................ 21
11. Authors' Addresses ......................................... 22
12. Full Copyright Statement ................................... 23
1. The SNMP Management Framework
The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major
components:
o An overall architecture, described in RFC 2571 [1].
o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the
purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of
Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in STD
16, RFC 1155 [2], STD 16, RFC 1212 [3] and RFC 1215 [4]. The
second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD 58, RFC 2578
[5], RFC 2579 [6] and RFC 2580 [7].
o Message protocols for transferring management information. The
first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and
described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second version of the SNMP
message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track
protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901 [9] and RFC
1906 [10]. The third version of the message protocol is called
SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906 [10], RFC 2572 [11] and RFC 2574
[12].
o Protocol operations for accessing management information. The
first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is
described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of protocol
operations and associated PDU formats is described in RFC 1905
[13].
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
o A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2573 [14] and
the view-based access control mechanism described in RFC 2575
[15].
A more detailed introduction to the current SNMP Management Framework
can be found in RFC 2570 [16].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.
This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A
MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate
translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically
equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no
translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable
information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in
SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine
readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the
MIB.
2. Conventions
The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD,
SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when
they appear in this document, are to be interpreted as described in
RFC 2119 [21].
3. Overview
This MIB module addresses the concept of inserting circuits, which
are potentially virtual, into the ifTable. There are multiple
reasons to allow circuits to be added to the ifTable. The most
prevalent of which are the standard routing MIB tables such as the
ipCidrRouteTable (IP-FORWARD-MIB) and the ipNetToMediaTable (IP-MIB)
act on the ifIndex and the RMON MIBs (RMON-MIB and RMON2-MIB as
defined in RFC 2819 [23] and RFC 2021 [19]) require the use of an
ifIndex a DataSource.
There is a further need to potentially monitor or manage a circuit
based on the directional flow of traffic going through it. For
instance, monitoring of protocols passed on a circuit using RMON-II
(RFC 2021 [19]) does not currently capture the direction of the flow.
This MIB module provides the capability to define an interface based
on the specific direction of the flow.
This section provides an overview and background of how to use this
MIB module.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
3.1. Circuit Concepts
There are multiple MIB modules that define circuits. Three commonly
used MIB modules are FRAME-RELAY-DTE-MIB (RFC 2115) [20], FRNETSERV-
MIB (RFC 2954) [18], and ATM-MIB (RFC 2515) [22]. These define
management objects for frame relay DTEs, frame relay services, and
ATM respectively. Each of these MIB modules contain the ability to
add or delete circuits; however, none create a specific ifEntry for
a circuit. The reason for this is that there are potentially
multiple circuits and not every circuit needs to be managed as an
individual interface. For example, not every circuit on a device
needs to be monitored with RMON and not every circuit needs to be
included as an individual circuit for routing. Further, the
Interfaces Group MIB (RFC 2863) [17] strongly recommends that
conceptual rows not be added to the ifTable for virtual circuits.
The rationale for creating conceptual rows in the ifTable for these
circuits is that there is a need for their use in either management
of routing or monitoring of data. Both of these functions require
mapping to an ifIndex.
This MIB module is designed such that only those circuits that
require an ifIndex need be added to the ifTable. This prevents
over-populating the ifTable with useless or otherwise unused indices.
While this document often refers to ATM and frame relay, it is not
specifically designed for only those types of circuits. Any circuit
that is defined in a MIB module but does not have its own ifIndex MAY
be added with this MIB module.
3.2. Theory of Operation
3.2.1. Creation Process
In some cases, devices will automatically populate the rows of
ciCircuitTable as circuits are created or discovered. However, in
many cases, it may be necessary for a network manager to manually
create rows.
Manual creation of rows requires the following steps:
1) Locate or create the circuit that is to be added on the device.
2) Create a row in ciCircuitTable for each flow type that is
required.
The first step above requires some knowledge of the circuits that
exist on a device. Typically, logical ports have entries in the
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
ifTable. If, for example, the ifType for the logical port is
frameRelay(32), the circuits can be located in the frCircuitTable of
the Frame Relay DTE MIB (FRAME-RELAY-DTE-MIB) [18]. If, as another
example, the ifType for the logical port is frameRelayService(44),
the circuits can be located in the frPVCEndptTable of the Frame Relay
Service MIB (FRNETSERV-MIB) [20]. If, as a final example, the ifType
for the logical port is aal5(49), the circuits can be located in the
aal5VccTable of the ATM MIB (ATM-MIB) [22]. An entry describing the
circuit MUST exist in some table prior to creating a row in
ciCircuitTable. The object identifier that MUST be used in the
circuit definition is the lexicographically smallest accessible OID
that fully describes the the circuit.
3.2.2. Destruction Process
3.2.2.1. Manual Row Destruction
Manual row destruction is straight forward. Any row can be destroyed
and the resources allocated to it are freed by setting the value of
its status object (ciCircuitStatus) to destroy(6). It should be
noted that when ciCircuitStatus is set to destroy(6) all associated
rows in the ifTable and in ciIfMapTable will also be destroyed. This
process MAY trigger further row destruction in other tables as well.
3.2.2.2. Automatic Row Destruction
Rows in the tables MAY be destroyed automatically based on the
existence of the circuit on which they rely. When a circuit no
longer exists in the device, the data in the tables has no relation
to anything known on the network. For this reason, rows MUST be
removed from this table as soon as it is discovered that the
associated circuits no longer exist. The effects of automatic row
destruction are the same as manual row destruction.
3.2.3. Modification Process
Since no objects in the MIB module can be changed once rows are
active, there are no modification caveats.
3.2.4. Persistence of Data
Each row in the tables of this MIB module relies on information from
other MIB modules. The rules for persistence of the data SHOULD
follow the same rules as those of the underlying MIB module. For
example, if the circuit defined by ciCircuitObject would normally be
stored in non-volatile memory, then the ciCircuitEntry SHOULD also be
non-volatile.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
4. Relation to Other MIB Modules
4.1. Frame Relay DTE MIB
There is no required relation to the Frame Relay DTE MIB beyond the
fact that rows in the frCircuitTable MAY be referenced. However, if
frCircuitLogicalIfIndex is being used to represent the same
information as a ciCircuitEntry with a value of ciCircuitFlow equal
to both(3), the implementation MAY use the same ifIndex.
4.2. Frame Relay Service MIB
There is no explicit relation to the Frame Relay Service MIB beyond
the fact that a rows in the frPVCEndptTable MAY be referenced.
4.3. ATM MIB
There is no explicit relation to the ATM MIB beyond the fact that
rows in multiple tables may be referenced.
4.4. Interfaces Group MIB
4.4.1. Interfaces Table (ifTable, ifXtable)
The following specifies how the Interfaces Group defined in the IF-
MIB will be used for the management of interfaces created by this MIB
module.
Values of specific ifTable objects for circuit interfaces are as
follows:
Object Name Value of Object
=========== =====================================================
ifIndex Each entry in the circuit table is represented by an
ifEntry. The value of ifIndex is defined by the agent
such that it complies with any internal numbering
scheme.
ifType The value of ifType is specific to the type of circuit
desired. For example, the value for frame relay
virtual circuits is frDlciEndPt(193) and the value for
ATM virtual circuits is atmVciEndPt(194). If the
circuit is to be used in RMON, propVirtual(53) SHOULD
NOT be used.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
ifMtu Set to the size in octets of the largest packet, frame
or PDU supported on the circuit. If this is not known
to the ifMtu object shall be set to zero. If the
circuit is not modeled as a packet-oriented interface,
this object SHOULD NOT be supported and result in
noSuchInstance.
ifSpeed The peak bandwidth in bits per second available for
use. This will equal either the ifSpeed of the
logical link if policing is not enforced or the
maximum information rate otherwise. If neither is
known, the ifSpeed object shall be set to zero.
ifPhysAddress This will always be an octet string of zero length.
ifInOctets The number of octets received by the network (ingress)
for this circuit. This counter should count only
octets included the header information and user data.
If the device does not support statistics on the
circuit, this object MUST NOT be supported and result
in noSuchInstance.
ifInUcastPkts The unerrored number of frames, packets or PDUs
received by the network (ingress) for this circuit.
If the device does not support statistics on the
circuit, this object MUST NOT be supported and result
in noSuchInstance.
ifInDiscards The number of received frames, packets or PDUs for
this circuit discarded due to ingress buffer
congestion and traffic policing. If the device does
not support statistics on the circuit, this object
MUST NOT be supported and result in noSuchInstance.
ifInErrors The number of received frames, packets or PDUs for
this circuit that are discarded because of an error.
If the device does not support statistics on the
circuit, this object MUST NOT be supported and result
in noSuchInstance.
ifOutOctets The number of octets sent by the network (egress) for
this circuit. This counter should count only octets
included the header information and user data. If the
device does not support statistics on the circuit,
this object MUST NOT be supported and result in
noSuchInstance.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
ifOutUcastpkts The number of unerrored frames, packets or PDUs sent
by the network (egress) for this circuit. If the
device does not support statistics on the circuit,
this object MUST NOT be supported and result in
noSuchInstance.
ifOutDiscards The number of frames, packets or PDUs discarded in the
egress direction for this circuit. Possible reasons
are as follows: policing, congestion. If the device
does not support statistics on the circuit, this
object MUST NOT be supported and result in
noSuchInstance.
ifOutErrors The number of frames, packets or PDUs discarded for
this circuit in the egress direction because of an
error. If the device does not support statistics on
the circuit, this object MUST NOT be supported and
result in noSuchInstance.
ifInBroadcastPkts
If the device does not support statistics on the
circuit, this object MUST NOT be supported and result
in noSuchInstance.
ifOutBroadcastPkts
If the device does not support Broadcast packets on
the circuit, this object should not be supported and
result in noSuchInstance.
ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable
Set to false(2). Circuits often have a predefined
notification mechanism. In such instances, the number
of notification sent would be doubled if this were
enabled.
ifPromiscuousMode
Set to false(2). If the circuit is not modeled as a
packet-oriented interface, this object SHOULD NOT be
supported and result in noSuchInstance.
ifConnectorPresent
Set to false(2).
All other values are supported as stated in the IF-MIB documentation.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
4.4.2. Stack Table (ifStackTable)
This section describes by example how to use ifStackTable to
represent the relationship between circuit and logical link
interfaces.
Example 1: Circuits (C) on a frame relay logical link.
+---+ +---+ +---+
| C | | C | | C |
+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+
| | |
+---+------+------+---+
| Frame Relay Service |
+----------+----------+
|
+----------+----------+
| Physical Layer |
+---------------------+
The assignment of the index values could for example be (for a V35
physical interface):
ifIndex Description
======= ===========
1 frDlciEndPt (type 193)
2 frDlciEndPt (type 193)
3 frDlciEndPt (type 193)
4 frameRelayService (type 44)
5 v35 (type 33)
The ifStackTable is then used to show the relationships between each
interface.
HigherLayer LowerLayer
=========== ==========
0 1
0 2
0 3
1 4
2 4
3 4
4 5
5 0
In the above example the frame relay logical link could just as
easily be of type frameRelay(32) instead.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
Example 2: Circuits (C) on a AAL5 logical link.
+---+ +---+ +---+
| C | | C | | C |
+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+
| | |
+---+------+------+---+
| AAL5 Layer |
+----------+----------+
|
+----------+----------+
| ATM Layer |
+---------------------+
|
+----------+----------+
| Physical Layer |
+---------------------+
The assignment of the index values could for example be (for a DS3
physical interface):
ifIndex Description
======= ===========
1 atmVciEndPt (type 194)
2 atmVciEndPt (type 194)
3 atmVciEndPt (type 194)
4 aal5 (type 49)
5 atm (type 37)
6 ds3 (type 30)
The ifStackTable is then used to show the relationships between each
interface.
HigherLayer LowerLayer
=========== ==========
0 1
0 2
0 3
1 4
2 4
3 4
4 5
5 6
6 0
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
4.5. Other MIB Modules
There is no explicit relation to any other media specific MIB module
beyond the fact that rows in multiple tables may be referenced.
5. Structure of the MIB Module
The CIRCUIT-IF-MIB consists of the following components:
o ciCircuitTable
o ciIfMapTable
Refer to the compliance statement defined within for a definition of
what objects MUST be implemented.
5.1. ciCircuitTable
The ciCircuitTable is the central control table for operations of the
Circuit Interfaces MIB. It provides a means of mapping a circuit to
its ifIndex as well as forcing the insertion of an ifIndex into the
ifTable. The agent is responsible for managing the ifIndex itself
such that no device dependent indexing scheme is violated.
A row in this table MUST exist in order for a row to exist in any
other table in this MIB module.
5.2. ciIfMapTable
This table maps the ifIndex back to the circuit that it is associated
with.
6. Object Definitions
CIRCUIT-IF-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
mib-2, Gauge32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, RowStatus,
TimeStamp, RowPointer, StorageType FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF
ifIndex, InterfaceIndex FROM IF-MIB;
circuitIfMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200201030000Z" -- January 3, 2002
ORGANIZATION "IETF Frame Relay Service MIB Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
"IETF Frame Relay Service MIB (frnetmib) Working Group
WG Charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/
frnetmib-charter.html
WG-email: frnetmib@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subscribe: frnetmib-request@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Email Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib
Chair: Andy Malis
Vivace Networks
Email: Andy.Malis@vivacenetworks.com
WG editor: Robert Steinberger
Paradyne Networks and
Fujitsu Network Communications
Email: robert.steinberger@fnc.fujitsu.com
Co-author: Orly Nicklass
RAD Data Communications Ltd.
EMail: Orly_n@rad.co.il"
DESCRIPTION
"The MIB module to allow insertion of selected circuit into
the ifTable."
REVISION "200201030000Z" -- January 3, 2002
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC 3201"
::= { mib-2 94 }
-- Textual Conventions
CiFlowDirection ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The direction of data flow thru a circuit.
transmit(1) - Only transmitted data
receive(2) - Only received data
both(3) - Both transmitted and received data."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
transmit(1),
receive(2),
both(3)
}
ciObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { circuitIfMIB 1 }
ciCapabilities OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { circuitIfMIB 2 }
ciConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { circuitIfMIB 3 }
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
-- The Circuit Interface Circuit Table
--
-- This table is used to define and display the circuits that
-- are added to the ifTable. It maps circuits to their respective
-- ifIndex values.
ciCircuitTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF CiCircuitEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Circuit Interface Circuit Table."
::= { ciObjects 1 }
ciCircuitEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX CiCircuitEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in the Circuit Interface Circuit Table."
INDEX { ciCircuitObject, ciCircuitFlow }
::= { ciCircuitTable 1 }
CiCircuitEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
--
-- Index Control Variables
--
ciCircuitObject RowPointer,
ciCircuitFlow CiFlowDirection,
ciCircuitStatus RowStatus,
--
-- Data variables
--
ciCircuitIfIndex InterfaceIndex,
ciCircuitCreateTime TimeStamp,
--
-- Data Persistence
--
ciCircuitStorageType StorageType
}
ciCircuitObject OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This value contains the RowPointer that uniquely
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
describes the circuit that is to be added to this table.
Any RowPointer that will force the size of OBJECT
IDENTIFIER of the row to grow beyond the legal limit
MUST be rejected.
The purpose of this object is to point a network manager
to the table in which the circuit was created as well as
define the circuit on which the interface is defined.
Valid tables for this object include the frCircuitTable
from the Frame Relay DTE MIB(FRAME-RELAY-DTE-MIB), the
frPVCEndptTable from the Frame Relay Service MIB
(FRNETSERV-MIB), and the aal5VccTable from the ATM MIB
(ATM MIB). However, including circuits from other MIB
tables IS NOT prohibited."
::= { ciCircuitEntry 1 }
ciCircuitFlow OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX CiFlowDirection
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The direction of data flow through the circuit for which
the virtual interface is defined. The following define
the information that the virtual interface will report.
transmit(1) - Only transmitted frames
receive(2) - Only received frames
both(3) - Both transmitted and received frames.
It is recommended that the ifDescr of the circuit
interfaces that are not both(3) SHOULD have text warning
the operators that the particular interface represents
only half the traffic on the circuit."
::= { ciCircuitEntry 2 }
ciCircuitStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status of the current row. This object is
used to add, delete, and disable rows in this
table. When the status changes to active(1), a row
will also be added to the interface map table below
and a row will be added to the ifTable. These rows
SHOULD not be removed until the status is changed
from active(1). The value of ifIndex for the row that
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
is added to the ifTable is determined by the agent
and MUST follow the rules of the ifTable. The value
of ifType for that interface will be frDlciEndPt(193)
for a frame relay circuit, atmVciEndPt(194) for an
ATM circuit, or another ifType defining the circuit
type for any other circuit.
When this object is set to destroy(6), the associated
row in the interface map table will be removed and the
ifIndex will be removed from the ifTable. Removing
the ifIndex MAY initiate a chain of events that causes
changes to other tables as well.
The rows added to this table MUST have a valid object
identifier for ciCircuitObject. This means that the
referenced object must exist and it must be in a table
that supports circuits.
The object referenced by ciCircuitObject MUST exist
prior to transitioning a row to active(1). If at any
point the object referenced by ciCircuitObject does not
exist or the row containing it is not in the active(1)
state, the status SHOULD either age out the row or
report notReady(3). The effects transitioning from
active(1) to notReady(3) are the same as those caused
by setting the status to destroy(6).
Each row in this table relies on information from other
MIB modules. The rules persistence of data SHOULD follow
the same rules as those of the underlying MIB module.
For example, if the circuit defined by ciCircuitObject
would normally be stored in non-volatile memory, then
the row SHOULD also be non-volatile."
::= { ciCircuitEntry 3 }
ciCircuitIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InterfaceIndex
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The ifIndex that the agent assigns to this row."
::= { ciCircuitEntry 4 }
ciCircuitCreateTime OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
"This object returns the value of sysUpTime at the time
the value of ciCircuitStatus last transitioned to
active(1). If ciCircuitStatus has never been active(1),
this object SHOULD return 0."
::= { ciCircuitEntry 5 }
ciCircuitStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type used for this row."
::= { ciCircuitEntry 6 }
-- The Circuit Interface Map Table
--
-- This table maps the ifIndex values that are assigned to
-- rows in the circuit table back to the objects that define
-- the circuits.
ciIfMapTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF CiIfMapEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Circuit Interface Map Table."
::= { ciObjects 2 }
ciIfMapEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX CiIfMapEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in the Circuit Interface Map Table."
INDEX { ifIndex }
::= { ciIfMapTable 1 }
CiIfMapEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
--
-- Mapped Object Variables
--
ciIfMapObject RowPointer,
ciIfMapFlow CiFlowDirection
}
ciIfMapObject OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This value contains the value of RowPointer that
corresponds to the current ifIndex."
::= { ciIfMapEntry 1 }
ciIfMapFlow OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX CiFlowDirection
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value contains the value of ciCircuitFlow that
corresponds to the current ifIndex."
::= { ciIfMapEntry 2 }
-- Change tracking metrics
ciIfLastChange OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime at the most recent change to
ciCircuitStatus for any row in ciCircuitTable."
::= { ciObjects 3 }
ciIfNumActive OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of active rows in ciCircuitTable."
::= { ciObjects 4 }
-- Conformance Information
ciMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ciConformance 1 }
ciMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ciConformance 2 }
--
-- Compliance Statements
--
ciCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for SNMP entities
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
which support of the Circuit Interfaces MIB module.
This group defines the minimum level of support
required for compliance."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { ciCircuitGroup,
ciIfMapGroup,
ciStatsGroup }
OBJECT ciCircuitStatus
SYNTAX INTEGER { active(1) } -- subset of RowStatus
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Row creation can be done outside of the scope of
the SNMP protocol. If this object is implemented with
max-access of read-only, then the only value that MUST
be returned is active(1)."
OBJECT ciCircuitStorageType
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"It is legal to support ciCircuitStorageType as read-
only as long as the value reported in consistent
with the actual storage mechanism employed within the
agent."
::= { ciMIBCompliances 1 }
--
-- Units of Conformance
--
ciCircuitGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
ciCircuitStatus,
ciCircuitIfIndex,
ciCircuitCreateTime,
ciCircuitStorageType
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of required objects providing
information from the circuit table."
::= { ciMIBGroups 1 }
ciIfMapGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
ciIfMapObject,
ciIfMapFlow
}
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of required objects providing
information from the interface map table."
::= { ciMIBGroups 2 }
ciStatsGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
ciIfLastChange,
ciIfNumActive
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of statistical metrics used to help manage
the ciCircuitTable."
::= { ciMIBGroups 3 }
END
7. Acknowledgments
This document was produced by the Frame Relay Service MIB Working
Group.
8. References
[1] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for
Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571, April 1999.
[2] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16, RFC
1155, May 1990.
[3] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,
RFC 1212, March 1991.
[4] Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the
SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991.
[5] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
[6] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,
RFC 2579, April 1999.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
[7] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD
58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
[8] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple
Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990.
[9] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
"Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901, January
1996.
[10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Transport
Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
(SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.
[11] Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "Message
Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999.
[12] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM)
for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
(SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999.
[13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol
Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.
[14] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications", RFC
2573, April 1999.
[15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access
Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol
(SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999.
[16] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction
to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management
Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999.
[17] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB",
RFC 2863, June 2000.
[18] Rehbehn, K. and D. Fowler, "Definitions of Managed Objects for
Frame Relay Service", RFC 2954, October 2000.
[19] Waldbusser, S., "Remote Network Monitoring Management
Information Base Version 2 using SMIv2", RFC 2021, January 1997.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
[20] Brown, C. and F. Baker, "Management Information Base for Frame
Relay DTEs Using SMIv2", RFC 2115, September 1997.
[21] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[22] Tesink, K., "Definitions of Managed Objects for ATM Management",
RFC 2515, February 1999.
[23] Waldbusser, S., "Remote Network Monitoring Management
Information Base", RFC 2819, May 2000.
9. Security Considerations
There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB that
have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such
objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network
environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure
environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on
network operations.
SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network
itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is no
control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and
GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB.
It is recommended that the implementers consider the security
features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use
of the User-based Security Model RFC 2274 [12] and the View-based
Access Control Model RFC 2275 [15] is recommended.
It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP
entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly
configured to give access to the objects only to those principals
(users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET
(change/create/delete) them.
10. IANA Considerations
New ifTypes defined specifically for use in this MIB module SHOULD be
in the form of ***EndPt. This is similar to frDlciEndPt(193) and
atmVciEndPt(194) which are already defined.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
11. Authors' Addresses
Robert Steinberger
Fujitsu Network Communications
2801 Telecom Parkway
Richardson, TX 75082
Phone: 1-972-479-4739
EMail: robert.steinberger@fnc.fujitsu.com
Orly Nicklass, Ph.D
RAD Data Communications Ltd.
12 Hanechoshet Street
Tel Aviv, Israel 69710
Phone: 972 3 7659969
EMail: Orly_n@rad.co.il
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 3201 Circuit to Interface MIB January 2002
12. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC, FYI, BCP