Network Working Group W. Harold
Request for Comments: 3529 IBM
Category: Experimental April 2003
Using Extensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Calling
(XML-RPC) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)
Status of this Memo
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
XML-RPC is an Extensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Calling
protocol that works over the Internet. It defines an XML format for
messages that are transfered between clients and servers using HTTP.
An XML-RPC message encodes either a procedure to be invoked by the
server, along with the parameters to use in the invocation, or the
result of an invocation. Procedure parameters and results can be
scalars, numbers, strings, dates, etc.; they can also be complex
record and list structures.
This document specifies a how to use the Blocks Extensible Exchange
Protocol (BEEP) to transfer messages encoded in the XML-RPC format
between clients and servers.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. BEEP Profile Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1 Profile Initialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. XML-RPC Message Packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. XML-RPC Message Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. URL Schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1 The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1.1 Resolving IP/TCP Address Information . . . . . . 6
5.2 The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Initial Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.1 Registration: The XML-RPC Profile . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.2 Registration: The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme. . . . . . . . 9
Harold Experimental [Page 1]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
6.3 Registration: The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . 10
6.4 Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number
for XML-RPC over BEEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Appendix
A. Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
B. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1. Introduction
This memo specifies how messages encoded in the XML-RPC [1] format
are transmitted using a BEEP profile [2].
Throughout this memo, the terms "request" and "response" refer to the
"methodCall" and "methodResponse" elements defined by the XML-RPC
specification [1]. Further the terms "peer", "client", "server", and
"one-to-one" are used in the context of BEEP. In particular,
Sections 2.1 and 2.1.1 of [2] discuss BEEP roles and exchange styles.
2. BEEP Profile Identification
The BEEP profile for XML-RPC is identified as
http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc
in the BEEP "profile" element during channel creation.
In BEEP, when the first channel is successfully created, the
"serverName" attribute in the "start" element identifies the "virtual
host" associated with the peer acting in the server role, e.g.,
The "serverName" attribute is analogous to HTTP's "Host" request-
header field (c.f., Section 14.23 of [3]).
Harold Experimental [Page 2]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
There are two states in the BEEP profile for XML-RPC, "boot", the
profile's initial state, and "ready":
o In the "boot" state, the peer requesting the creation of the
channel sends a "bootmsg" (either during channel initialization or
in a "MSG" message).
* If the other peer sends a "bootrpy" (either during channel
initialization or in a "RPY" message), then the "ready" state
is entered
* Otherwise, the other peer sends an "error" (either during
channel initialization or in a "ERR" message), and no state
change occurs.
o In the "ready" state, the initiating peer begins an XML-RPC
message pattern by sending a "MSG" message containing a request.
The other peer completes the message pattern by sending back a
"RPY" message containing a response.
2.1 Profile Initialization
The boot message is used to identify the resource accessed by the
channel bound to the BEEP profile for XML-RPC.
The DTD syntax for the boot message and its response are:
The boot message contains a single mandatory attribute: "resource",
which is analagous to HTTP's "abs_path" Request-URI parameter (c.f.,
Section 5.1.2 of [3])
If the peer acting in the server role recognizes the requested
resource, it replies with a boot response. Otherwise, if the boot
message is improperly formed, or if the requested resource isn't
recognized, the peer acting in the server role replies with an error
message (c.f., Section 7.1 of [2]).
Typically, the boot message and its response are exchanged during
channel initialization (c.f., Section 2.3.1.2 of [2]).
Harold Experimental [Page 3]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
For example, here the boot message and its response are exchanged
during channel initialization:
C:
C:
C: ]]>
C:
C:
S:
S: ]]>
S:
The channel bound to the BEEP profile for XML-RPC is now in the
"ready" state.
Alternatively, here is an example in which the boot exchange is
unsuccessful:
C:
C:
C: ]]>
C:
C:
S:
S: resource not
S: supported]]>
S:
Although the channel was created successfully, it remains in the
"boot" state.
3. XML-RPC Message Packages
The BEEP profile for XML-RPC transmits requests and responses encoded
as UTF-8 using the media type "application/xml" [4], e.g.,
I: MSG 1 1 . 0 364
I: Content-Type: application/xml
I:
I:
I:
I: examples.getStateName
I:
I:
I: 41
I:
I: END
and its associated response
L: RPY 1 1 . 201 100
L: Content-Type: application/xml
L:
L:
L:
L:
L:
L: South Dakota
L:
L: END
4. XML-RPC Message Exchange
A request/response exchange involves sending a request, which results
in a response being returned.
The BEEP profile for XML-RPC achieves this using a one-to-one
exchange, in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an
request, and the server sends back a "RPY" message containing an
response.
The BEEP profile for XML-RPC does not use the "ERR" message for XML-
RPC faults when performing one-to-one exchanges. Whatever response
is generated by the server is always returned in the "RPY" message.
5. URL Schemes
This memo defines two URL schemes, "xmlrpc.beep" and "xmlrpc.beeps",
which identify the use of XML-RPC over BEEP over TCP. Note that, at
present, a "generic" URL scheme for XML-RPC is not defined.
5.1 The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme
The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme uses the "generic URI" syntax defined in
Section 3 of [5], specifically:
o the value "xmlrpc.beep" is used for the scheme component; and,
o the server-based naming authority defined in Section 3.2.2 of [5]
is used for the authority component.
Harold Experimental [Page 5]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
o the path component maps to the "resource" component of the boot
message sent during profile initialization (if absent, it defaults
to "/").
The values of both the scheme and authority components are case-
insensitive.
For example, the URL
xmlrpc.beep://stateserver.example.com/NumberToName
might result in the example shown in Section 2.1.
5.1.1 Resolving IP/TCP Address Information
The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme indicates the use of the BEEP profile
for XML-RPC running over TCP/IP.
If the authority component contains a domain name and a port number,
e.g.,
xmlrpc.beep://stateserver.example.com:1026
then the DNS is queried for the A RRs corresponding to the domain
name, and the port number is used directly.
If the authority component contains a domain name and no port number,
e.g.,
xmlrpc.beep://stateserver.example.com
the SRV algorithm [6] is used with a service parameter of "xmlrpc-
beep" and a protocol parameter of "tcp" to determine the IP/TCP
addressing information. If no appropriate SRV RRs are found (e.g.,
for "_xmlrpc-beep._tcp.stateserver.example.com"), then the DNS is
queried for the A RRs corresponding to the domain name and the port
number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section
6.4.
If the authority component contains an IP address, e.g.,
xmlrpc.beep://10.0.0.2:1026
then the DNS is not queried, and the IP address is used directly. If
a port number is present, it is used directly; otherwise, the port
number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section
6.4.
Harold Experimental [Page 6]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
While the use of literal IPv6 addresses in URLs is discouraged, if a
literal IPv6 address is used in a "xmlrpc.beep" URL, it must conform
to the syntax specified in [7].
5.2 The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme
The "xmlrpc.beeps" URL scheme is identical, in all ways, to the
"xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme specified in Section 5.1, with the exception
that prior to starting the BEEP profile for XML-RPC, the BEEP session
must be tuned for privacy. In particular, note that both URL schemes
use the identical algorithms and parameters for address resolution as
specified in Section 5.1.1 (e.g., the same service name for SRV
lookups, the same port number for TCP, and so on).
There are two ways to perform privacy tuning on a BEEP session,
either:
o a transport security profile may be successfully started; or,
o a user authentication profile that supports transport security may
be successfully started.
In either case the client must present the authority component of the
URL in the "serverName" attribute of the "start" element it uses to
tune the session for privacy.
When TLS is used for privacy the client must verify that the
authority component of the URL matches the server's identity as
presented in the server's certificate. Section 2.4 of [9] describes
the matching process.
For the URL:
xmlrpc.beeps://stateserver.example.com/NumberToName
the whole process might look like:
S:
C:
C: RPY 0 0 . 0 52
C: Content-Type: application/xml
C:
C:
Harold Experimental [Page 7]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
S:
S: END
C: MSG 0 1 . 52 158
C: Content-Type: application/xml
C:
C:
C:
C: ]]>
C:
C:
C: END
S: RPY 0 1 . 110 121
S: Content-Type: application/xml
S:
S:
S: ]]>
S:
S: END
... TLS negotiations ...
S: RPY 0 0 . 0 88
S: Content-Type: application/xml
S:
S:
S:
S:
S: END
C: RPY 0 0 . 0 52
C: Content-Type: application/xml
C:
C:
C:
C: ]]>
C:
C:
C: END
Harold Experimental [Page 8]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
S: RPY 0 2 . 341 402
S: Content-Type: application/xml
S:
S:
S: ]]>
S:
S: END
6. Initial Registrations
6.1 Registration: The XML-RPC Profile
Profile Identification: http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc
Messages exchanged during Channel Creation: bootmsg, bootrpy
Messages starting one-to-one exchanges: bootmsg, methodCall
Messages in positive replies: bootrpy, methodResponse
Messages in negative replies: error
Messages in one-to-many exchanges: none
Message Syntax: methodCall, methodResponse as defined in [1]
Message Semantics: c.f., [1]
Contact Information: Ward Harold
6.2 Registration: The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme
URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beep
URL scheme syntax: c.f., Section 5.1
Character encoding considerations: c.f., the "generic URI" syntax
defined in Section 3 of [5]
Intended usage: identifies a XML-RPC resource made available using
the BEEP profile for XML-RPC
Applications using this scheme: c.f., "Intended usage", above
Interoperability considerations: n/a
Security Considerations: c.f., Section 7
Harold Experimental [Page 9]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], and [2]
Contact Information: Ward Harold
Author/Change controller: the IESG
6.3 Registration: The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme
URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beeps
URL scheme syntax: c.f., Section 5.2
Character encoding considerations: c.f., the "generic URI" syntax
defined in Section 3 of [5]
Intended usage: identifies a XML-RPC resource made available using
the BEEP profile for XML-RPC after the BEEP session has been tuned
for privacy
Applications using this scheme: c.f., "Intended usage", above
Interoperability considerations: n/a
Security Considerations: c.f., Section 7
Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], and [2]
Contact Information: Ward Harold
Author/Change controller: the IESG
6.4 Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number for XML-RPC
over BEEP
Protocol Number: TCP
Message Formats, Types, Opcodes, and Sequences: c.f., Section 2.1
Functions: c.f., [1]
Use of Broadcast/Multicast: none
Proposed Name: XML-RPC over BEEP
Short name: xmlrpc-beep
Contact Information: Ward Harold
Harold Experimental [Page 10]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
7. Security Considerations
Although service provisioning is a policy matter, at a minimum, all
implementations must provide the following tuning profiles:
for authentication: http://iana.org/beep/SASL/DIGEST-MD5
for confidentiality: http://iana.org/beep/TLS (using the
TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA cipher)
for both: http://iana.org/beep/TLS (using the
TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA cipher supporting client-side
certificates)
Further, implementations may choose to offer MIME-based security
services providing message integrity and confidentiality, such as
OpenPGP [8] or S/MIME [10].
Regardless, consult [2]'s Section 9 for a discussion of BEEP-specific
security issues.
8. References
[1] Winer, D., "XML-RPC Specification", January 1999,
http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec
[2] Rose, M., "The Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol Core", RFC
3080, March 2001.
[3] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L.,
Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[4] Murata, M., St. Laurent, S. and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC
3023, January 2001.
[5] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource
Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August 1998.
[6] Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P. and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for
specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", RFC 2782,
February 2000.
[7] Hinden, R., Carpenter, B. and L. Masinter, "Format for Literal
IPv6 Addresses in URL's", RFC 2732, December 1999.
[8] Elkins, M., Del Torto, D., Levien, R. and T. Roessler, "MIME
Security with OpenPGP", RFC 3156, August 2001.
Harold Experimental [Page 11]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
[9] Newman, C., "Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP", RFC 2595, June
1999.
[10] Ramsdell, B., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC
2633, June 1999.
[11] O'Tuathail, E. and M. Rose, "Using the Simple Object Access
Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)",
RFC 3288, June 2002.
Harold Experimental [Page 12]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
This document is based, in part, on Using SOAP in BEEP [11] and the
author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Marshall Rose
Appendix B. IANA Considerations
The IANA has registered the profile specified in Section 6.1, and has
selected an IANA-specific URI, e.g.,
http://iana.org/beep/xmlrpc
The IANA has registered "xmlrpc.beep" and "xmlrpc.beeps" as URL
schemes, as specified in Section 6.2 and Section 6.3, respectively.
(See: http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes)
The IANA has registered "XML-RPC over BEEP" as a TCP port number
(602), as specified in Section 6.4. (See:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers)
Harold Experimental [Page 13]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
Author's Address
Ward K Harold
IBM
11400 Burnet Road
Austin, Texas 78759
US
Phone: +1 512 838 3622
EMail: wharold@us.ibm.com
Harold Experimental [Page 14]
RFC 3529 Using XML-RPC in BEEP April 2003
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Harold Experimental [Page 15]
RFC, FYI, BCP