Network Working Group J. Reschke
Request for Comments: 4709 greenbytes
Category: Informational October 2006
Mounting Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Servers
Status of This Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
In current Web browsers, there is no uniform way to specify that a
user clicking on a link will be presented with an editable view of a
Web Distinguished Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) server. For
example, it is frequently desirable to be able to click on a link and
have this link open a window that can handle drag-and-drop
interaction with the resources of a WebDAV server.
This document specifies a mechanism and a document format that
enables WebDAV servers to send "mounting" information to a WebDAV
client. The mechanism is designed to work on any platform and with
any combination of browser and WebDAV client, relying solely on the
well-understood dispatch of documents through their MIME type.
Reschke Informational [Page 1]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. Terminology .....................................................3
3. Format ..........................................................3
3.1. dm:mount ...................................................4
3.2. dm:url .....................................................4
3.3. dm:open ....................................................4
3.4. dm:username ................................................4
4. Example .........................................................4
5. Internationalization Considerations .............................5
6. IANA Considerations .............................................6
6.1. MIME Type Registration .....................................6
7. Security Considerations .........................................8
8. Acknowledgements ................................................8
9. References ......................................................9
9.1. Normative References .......................................9
9.2. Informative References .....................................9
Appendix A. Alternative Approaches ...............................10
A.1. ...Through HTML/CSS Extensions ............................10
A.2. ...Through Custom URI Schemes .............................10
Appendix B. Implementations ......................................10
B.1. Example Implementation for Webfolder Client ...............10
B.2. Xythos ....................................................14
1. Introduction
By definition, a Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)
server ([RFC2518]) is an HTTP server as well ([RFC2616]). Most
WebDAV servers can be (at least partly) operated from an HTML-based
user interface in a web browser. However, it is frequently desirable
to be able to switch from an HTML-based view to a presentation
provided by a native WebDAV client, directly supporting the authoring
features defined in WebDAV and related specifications.
This document specifies a platform-neutral mechanism based on the
dispatch of documents through their MIME type. For completeness,
Appendix A lists other approaches that have been implemented in
existing clients.
For example, many educational institutions use WebDAV servers as a
mechanism for sharing documents among students. Each student owns a
separate collection structure on a WebDAV server, often called his/
her "locker". Ideally, when users click on a link in an HTML page
provided by the university (perhaps by their university Web portal),
an editable view of their locker will appear.
Reschke Informational [Page 2]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
2. Terminology
The terminology used here follows that in the WebDAV Distributed
Authoring Protocol specification [RFC2518].
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
This document uses XML DTD fragments ([XML]) as a purely notational
convention. In particular:
o Element names use the namespace
"http://purl.org/NET/webdav/mount". When an XML element type in
this namespace is referenced in this document outside of the
context of an XML fragment, the string "dm:" will be prefixed to
the element name.
o Element ordering is irrelevant.
o Extension elements/attributes (elements/attributes not already
defined as valid child elements) may be added anywhere, except
when explicitly stated otherwise.
3. Format
A WebDAV mount request is encoded in a specific XML format ([XML])
with a well-defined MIME type (see Section 6.1). The MIME type
allows user agents to dispatch the content to a handler specific to
the system's WebDAV client.
The elements defined below use the namespace
"http://purl.org/NET/webdav/mount".
Reschke Informational [Page 3]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
3.1. dm:mount
The element acts as a container for all the remaining
elements defined by this protocol.
3.2. dm:url
The mandatory element provides the HTTP URL of the WebDAV
collection that should be mounted by the client.
3.3. dm:open
The optional element instructs the client to display the
specified child collection; its URL is computed by concatenating this
element's value with the URL obtained from the (Section 3.2)
element (see Section 7 for a discussion about why this element only
supports displaying collections rather than opening arbitrary
documents).
3.4. dm:username
The server can use the optional element to specify the
name of the currently authenticated principal. A client can use this
value to select a matching mount point (different users may have
mounted the URL with different credentials under different local
mount points) or to provide a meaningful default for authentication
against the server. It is common that a browser and WebDAV client do
not share HTTP connections, so including this information in the
mount document increases usability.
Implementation Note: If a element is present, public
caching of the document should be disallowed. Thus, appropriate
'Vary' or 'Cache-Control' headers are needed in the server response.
4. Example
In the example below, the client first retrieves a representation of
a WebDAV collection using a generic Web browser (1). The returned
HTML content contains a hyperlink that identifies the "davmount"
document in the format defined in Section 3 (2). The user follows
this link (3), which causes the server to return the "davmount"
document to the user's browser (4). The browser in turn passes the
content to the application that was registered to handle the
"application/davmount+xml" MIME type, usually the default WebDAV
client on the client's system.
Reschke Informational [Page 4]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
(1) Client retrieves representation of WebDAV collection "/user42/
inbox/".
GET /user42/inbox/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
(2) Server returns representation.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: xxx
..
View this collection in your
WebDAV client
..
(note that the example shows only that part of the HTML page that
contains the relevant link)
(3) Client follows link to "davmount" document
GET /user42/inbox/?action=davmount HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
(4) Server returns "davmount" document
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/davmount+xml
Content-Length: xxx
Cache-Control: private
http://www.example.com/user42/
inbox/
5. Internationalization Considerations
This document does not introduce any new internationalization
considerations beyond those discussed in [RFC2518], Section 16.
Reschke Informational [Page 5]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
6. IANA Considerations
6.1. MIME Type Registration
Type name:
application
Subtype name:
davmount+xml
Required parameters:
none
Optional parameters:
"charset": This parameter has identical semantics to the charset
parameter of the "application/xml" media type as specified in
[RFC3023].
Encoding considerations:
Identical to those of "application/xml" as described in [RFC3023],
Section 3.2.
Security considerations:
As defined in this specification. In addition, as this media type
uses the "+xml" convention, it shares the same security
considerations as described in [RFC3023], Section 10.
Interoperability considerations:
There are no known interoperability issues.
Published specification:
This specification.
Applications that use this media type:
SAP Netweaver Knowledge Management, Xythos Drive.
Reschke Informational [Page 6]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
Additional information:
Magic number(s):
As specified for "application/xml" in [RFC3023], Section 3.2.
File extension(s):
.davmount
Fragment identifiers:
As specified for "application/xml" in [RFC3023], Section 5.
Base URI:
As specified in [RFC3023], Section 6.
Macintosh file type code(s):
TEXT
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Julian Reschke
Intended usage:
COMMON
Restrictions on usage:
None.
Author:
Julian Reschke
Change controller:
IESG
Reschke Informational [Page 7]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
7. Security Considerations
All security considerations connected to HTTP/WebDAV and XML apply
for this specification as well, namely, [RFC2518] (Section 17) and
[RFC3470] (Section 7).
In addition, client implementers must be careful when implementing
the element (see Section 3.3). It MUST NOT be used to
initiate any action beyond displaying the contents of a WebDAV
collection (supporting "opening" documents could be abused to trick a
user into letting the operating system's shell execute arbitrary
content, possibly running it as an executable program).
The OPTIONAL element defined in Section 3.4 allows the
inclusion of user names into mount documents. However in some cases,
user name information is considered to be security sensitive. Should
this be the case, parties generating mount documents are advised to
either not to include user names, or to use access control to
restrict access to the information as desired.
8. Acknowledgements
This document has benefited from thoughtful discussion by Emile
Baizel, Spencer Dawkins, Lisa Dusseault, Stefan Eissing, Joe
Gregorio, Michal Gregr, Russ Housley, Jim Luther, Jaroslav Mazanec,
and Jim Whitehead.
Reschke Informational [Page 8]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2518] Goland, Y., Whitehead, E., Faizi, A., Carter, S., and D.
Jensen, "HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring --
WEBDAV", RFC 2518, February 1999.
[RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,
Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext
Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[RFC3023] Murata, M., St.Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media
Types", RFC 3023, January 2001.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, January 2005.
[XML] Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Maler, E., and
F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth
Edition)", W3C REC-xml-20060816, August 2006,
.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC3470] Hollenbeck, S., Rose, M., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines for
the Use of Extensible Markup Language (XML) within IETF
Protocols", RFC 3470, BCP 70, January 2003.
[WEBARCH] Walsh, N. and I. Jacobs, "Architecture of the World Wide
Web, Volume One", W3C REC-webarch-20041215, December 2004,
). However, at the time of
this writing, this extension was not implemented by any other user
agent.
A.2. ...Through Custom URI Schemes
The "kio" library of the "K Desktop Enviroment"
( element missing.");
WScript.Quit(2);
}
var ie = new ActiveXObject("InternetExplorer.Application");
ie.Navigate("about:blank");
var doc = ie.Document;
var folder = doc.createElement("span");
folder.addBehavior("#default#httpFolder");
var result = folder.navigate(n1.text +
(n2 == null ? "" : n2.text));
// close the window again when there was no element
if (n2 == null) ie.Quit();
if (result != "OK") {
if (result == "PROTOCOL_NOT_SUPPORTED") {
WScript.Echo("This site doesn't seem to support WebDAV.");
WScript.Quit(1);
}
else {
WScript.Echo("Unexpected status: " + result);
WScript.Quit(2);
}
}
Reschke Informational [Page 13]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
}
B.2. Xythos
The "Xythos Drive" WebDAV client for WebDAV supports this
specification starting with version 4.4.
Author's Address
Julian F. Reschke
greenbytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16
Muenster, NW 48155
Germany
Phone: +49 251 2807760
Fax: +49 251 2807761
EMail: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
URI: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/
Reschke Informational [Page 14]
RFC 4709 Mounting WebDAV Servers October 2006
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Reschke Informational [Page 15]
RFC, FYI, BCP