Network Working Group T. Bates
Request for Comments: 4760 Cisco Systems
Obsoletes: 2858 R. Chandra
Category: Standards Track Sonoa Systems
D. Katz
Y. Rekhter
Juniper Networks
January 2007
Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
Abstract
This document defines extensions to BGP-4 to enable it to carry
routing information for multiple Network Layer protocols (e.g., IPv6,
IPX, L3VPN, etc.). The extensions are backward compatible - a router
that supports the extensions can interoperate with a router that
doesn't support the extensions.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
1. Introduction
The only three pieces of information carried by BGP-4 [BGP-4] that
are IPv4 specific are (a) the NEXT_HOP attribute (expressed as an
IPv4 address), (b) AGGREGATOR (contains an IPv4 address), and (c)
NLRI (expressed as IPv4 address prefixes). This document assumes
that any BGP speaker (including the one that supports multiprotocol
capabilities defined in this document) has to have an IPv4 address
(which will be used, among other things, in the AGGREGATOR
attribute). Therefore, to enable BGP-4 to support routing for
multiple Network Layer protocols, the only two things that have to be
added to BGP-4 are (a) the ability to associate a particular Network
Layer protocol with the next hop information, and (b) the ability to
associate a particular Network Layer protocol with NLRI. To identify
individual Network Layer protocols associated with the next hop
information and semantics of NLRI, this document uses a combination
of Address Family, as defined in [IANA-AF], and Subsequent Address
Family (as described in this document).
One could further observe that the next hop information (the
information provided by the NEXT_HOP attribute) is meaningful (and
necessary) only in conjunction with the advertisements of reachable
destinations - in conjunction with the advertisements of unreachable
destinations (withdrawing routes from service), the next hop
information is meaningless. This suggests that the advertisement of
reachable destinations should be grouped with the advertisement of
the next hop to be used for these destinations, and that the
advertisement of reachable destinations should be segregated from the
advertisement of unreachable destinations.
To provide backward compatibility, as well as to simplify
introduction of the multiprotocol capabilities into BGP-4, this
document uses two new attributes, Multiprotocol Reachable NLRI
(MP_REACH_NLRI) and Multiprotocol Unreachable NLRI (MP_UNREACH_NLRI).
The first one (MP_REACH_NLRI) is used to carry the set of reachable
destinations together with the next hop information to be used for
forwarding to these destinations. The second one (MP_UNREACH_NLRI)
is used to carry the set of unreachable destinations. Both of these
attributes are optional and non-transitive. This way, a BGP speaker
that doesn't support the multiprotocol capabilities will just ignore
the information carried in these attributes and will not pass it to
other BGP speakers.
2. Specification of Requirements
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
3. Multiprotocol Reachable NLRI - MP_REACH_NLRI (Type Code 14):
This is an optional non-transitive attribute that can be used for the
following purposes:
(a) to advertise a feasible route to a peer
(b) to permit a router to advertise the Network Layer address of the
router that should be used as the next hop to the destinations
listed in the Network Layer Reachability Information field of the
MP_NLRI attribute.
The attribute is encoded as shown below:
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Address Family Identifier (2 octets) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Length of Next Hop Network Address (1 octet) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Network Address of Next Hop (variable) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reserved (1 octet) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Network Layer Reachability Information (variable) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
The use and meaning of these fields are as follows:
Address Family Identifier (AFI):
This field in combination with the Subsequent Address Family
Identifier field identifies the set of Network Layer protocols
to which the address carried in the Next Hop field must belong,
the way in which the address of the next hop is encoded, and
the semantics of the Network Layer Reachability Information
that follows. If the Next Hop is allowed to be from more than
one Network Layer protocol, the encoding of the Next Hop MUST
provide a way to determine its Network Layer protocol.
Presently defined values for the Address Family Identifier
field are specified in the IANA's Address Family Numbers
registry [IANA-AF].
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI):
This field in combination with the Address Family Identifier
field identifies the set of Network Layer protocols to which
the address carried in the Next Hop must belong, the way in
which the address of the next hop is encoded, and the semantics
of the Network Layer Reachability Information that follows. If
the Next Hop is allowed to be from more than one Network Layer
protocol, the encoding of the Next Hop MUST provide a way to
determine its Network Layer protocol.
Length of Next Hop Network Address:
A 1-octet field whose value expresses the length of the
"Network Address of Next Hop" field, measured in octets.
Network Address of Next Hop:
A variable-length field that contains the Network Address of
the next router on the path to the destination system. The
Network Layer protocol associated with the Network Address of
the Next Hop is identified by a combination of
carried in the attribute.
Reserved:
A 1 octet field that MUST be set to 0, and SHOULD be ignored
upon receipt.
Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI):
A variable length field that lists NLRI for the feasible routes
that are being advertised in this attribute. The semantics of
NLRI is identified by a combination of carried in
the attribute.
When the Subsequent Address Family Identifier field is set to
one of the values defined in this document, each NLRI is
encoded as specified in the "NLRI encoding" section of this
document.
The next hop information carried in the MP_REACH_NLRI path attribute
defines the Network Layer address of the router that SHOULD be used
as the next hop to the destinations listed in the MP_NLRI attribute
in the UPDATE message.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
The rules for the next hop information are the same as the rules for
the information carried in the NEXT_HOP BGP attribute (see Section
5.1.3 of [BGP-4]).
An UPDATE message that carries the MP_REACH_NLRI MUST also carry the
ORIGIN and the AS_PATH attributes (both in EBGP and in IBGP
exchanges). Moreover, in IBGP exchanges such a message MUST also
carry the LOCAL_PREF attribute.
An UPDATE message that carries no NLRI, other than the one encoded in
the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute, SHOULD NOT carry the NEXT_HOP attribute.
If such a message contains the NEXT_HOP attribute, the BGP speaker
that receives the message SHOULD ignore this attribute.
An UPDATE message SHOULD NOT include the same address prefix (of the
same ) in more than one of the following fields: WITHDRAWN
ROUTES field, Network Reachability Information fields, MP_REACH_NLRI
field, and MP_UNREACH_NLRI field. The processing of an UPDATE
message in this form is undefined.
4. Multiprotocol Unreachable NLRI - MP_UNREACH_NLRI (Type Code 15):
This is an optional non-transitive attribute that can be used for the
purpose of withdrawing multiple unfeasible routes from service.
The attribute is encoded as shown below:
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Address Family Identifier (2 octets) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Withdrawn Routes (variable) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
The use and the meaning of these fields are as follows:
Address Family Identifier (AFI):
This field in combination with the Subsequent Address Family
Identifier field identifies the set of Network Layer protocols
to which the address carried in the Next Hop field must belong,
the way in which the address of the next hop is encoded, and
the semantics of the Network Layer Reachability Information
that follows. If the Next Hop is allowed to be from more than
one Network Layer protocol, the encoding of the Next Hop MUST
provide a way to determine its Network Layer protocol.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
Presently defined values for the Address Family Identifier
field are specified in the IANA's Address Family Numbers
registry [IANA-AF].
Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI):
This field in combination with the Address Family Identifier
field identifies the set of Network Layer protocols to which
the address carried in the Next Hop must belong, the way in
which the address of the next hop is encoded, and the semantics
of the Network Layer Reachability Information that follows. If
the Next Hop is allowed to be from more than one Network Layer
protocol, the encoding of the Next Hop MUST provide a way to
determine its Network Layer protocol.
Withdrawn Routes Network Layer Reachability Information:
A variable-length field that lists NLRI for the routes that are
being withdrawn from service. The semantics of NLRI is
identified by a combination of carried in the
attribute.
When the Subsequent Address Family Identifier field is set to
one of the values defined in this document, each NLRI is
encoded as specified in the "NLRI encoding" section of this
document.
An UPDATE message that contains the MP_UNREACH_NLRI is not required
to carry any other path attributes.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
5. NLRI Encoding
The Network Layer Reachability information is encoded as one or more
2-tuples of the form , whose fields are described
below:
+---------------------------+
| Length (1 octet) |
+---------------------------+
| Prefix (variable) |
+---------------------------+
The use and the meaning of these fields are as follows:
a) Length:
The Length field indicates the length, in bits, of the address
prefix. A length of zero indicates a prefix that matches all (as
specified by the address family) addresses (with prefix, itself,
of zero octets).
b) Prefix:
The Prefix field contains an address prefix followed by enough
trailing bits to make the end of the field fall on an octet
boundary. Note that the value of trailing bits is irrelevant.
6. Subsequent Address Family Identifier
This document defines the following values for the Subsequent Address
Family Identifier field carried in the MP_REACH_NLRI and
MP_UNREACH_NLRI attributes:
1 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for unicast
forwarding
2 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for multicast
forwarding
An implementation MAY support all, some, or none of the Subsequent
Address Family Identifier values defined in this document.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
7. Error Handling
If a BGP speaker receives from a neighbor an UPDATE message that
contains the MP_REACH_NLRI or MP_UNREACH_NLRI attribute, and if the
speaker determines that the attribute is incorrect, the speaker MUST
delete all the BGP routes received from that neighbor whose AFI/SAFI
is the same as the one carried in the incorrect MP_REACH_NLRI or
MP_UNREACH_NLRI attribute. For the duration of the BGP session over
which the UPDATE message was received, the speaker then SHOULD ignore
all the subsequent routes with that AFI/SAFI received over that
session.
In addition, the speaker MAY terminate the BGP session over which the
UPDATE message was received. The session SHOULD be terminated with
the Notification message code/subcode indicating "UPDATE Message
Error"/"Optional Attribute Error".
8. Use of BGP Capability Advertisement
A BGP speaker that uses Multiprotocol Extensions SHOULD use the
Capability Advertisement procedures [BGP-CAP] to determine whether
the speaker could use Multiprotocol Extensions with a particular
peer.
The fields in the Capabilities Optional Parameter are set as follows.
The Capability Code field is set to 1 (which indicates Multiprotocol
Extensions capabilities). The Capability Length field is set to 4.
The Capability Value field is defined as:
0 7 15 23 31
+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| AFI | Res. | SAFI |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+
The use and meaning of this field is as follow:
AFI - Address Family Identifier (16 bit), encoded the same way as
in the Multiprotocol Extensions
Res. - Reserved (8 bit) field. SHOULD be set to 0 by the sender
and ignored by the receiver.
Note that not setting the field value to 0 may create issues
for a receiver not ignoring the field. In addition, this
definition is problematic if it is ever attempted to redefine
the field.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
SAFI - Subsequent Address Family Identifier (8 bit), encoded the
same way as in the Multiprotocol Extensions.
A speaker that supports multiple tuples includes them as
multiple Capabilities in the Capabilities Optional Parameter.
To have a bi-directional exchange of routing information for a
particular between a pair of BGP speakers, each such
speaker MUST advertise to the other (via the Capability Advertisement
mechanism) the capability to support that particular
route.
9. IANA Considerations
As specified in this document, the MP_REACH_NLRI and MP_UNREACH_NLRI
attributes contain the Subsequence Address Family Identifier (SAFI)
field. The SAFI name space is defined in this document. The IANA
registered and maintains values for the SAFI namespace as follows:
- SAFI values 1 and 2 are assigned in this document.
- SAFI value 3 is reserved. It was assigned by RFC 2858 for a use
that was never fully implemented, so it is deprecated by this
document.
- SAFI values 5 through 63 are to be assigned by IANA using either
the Standards Action process, defined in [RFC2434], or the Early
IANA Allocation process, defined in [RFC4020].
- SAFI values 67 through 127 are to be assigned by IANA, using the
"First Come First Served" policy, defined in RFC 2434.
- SAFI values 0 and 255 are reserved.
- SAFI values 128 through 240 are part of the previous "private
use" range. At the time of approval of this document, the
unused values were provided to IANA by the Routing Area
Director. These unused values, namely, 130, 131, 135 through
139, and 141 through 240, are considered reserved in order to
avoid conflicts.
- SAFI values 241 through 254 are for "private use", and values in
this range are not to be assigned by IANA.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
10. Comparison with RFC 2858
This document makes the use of the next hop information consistent
with the information carried in the NEXT_HOP BGP path attribute.
This document removes the definition of SAFI 3 and deprecates SAFI 3.
This document changes partitioning of the SAFI space. Specifically,
in RFC 2858 SAFI values 128 through 240 were part of the "private
use" range. This document specifies that of this range, allocations
that are currently in use are to be recognized by IANA, and that
unused values, namely 130, 131, 135 through 139, and 141 through 240,
should be considered reserved.
This document renames the Number of SNPAs field to Reserved and
removes the rest of the SNPA-related information from the
MP_REACH_NLRI attribute.
11. Comparison with RFC 2283
This document restricts the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute to carry only a
single instance of .
This document restricts the MP_UNREACH_NLRI attribute to carry only a
single instance of .
This document clarifies handling of an UPDATE message that carries no
NLRI, other than the one encoded in the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute.
This document clarifies error handling in the presence of
MP_REACH_NLRI or MP_UNREACH_NLRI attributes.
This document specifies the use of BGP Capabilities Advertisements in
conjunction with multi-protocol extensions.
Finally, this document includes the "IANA Consideration" section.
12. Security Considerations
This extension to BGP does not change the underlying security issues
inherent in the existing BGP.
13. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank members of the IDR Working Group for
their review and comments.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
14. Normative References
[BGP-CAP] Chandra, R. and J. Scudder, "Capabilities Advertisement
with BGP-4", RFC 3392, November 2002.
[BGP-4] Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway
Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, January 2006.
[IANA-AF] "Address Family Numbers", Reachable from
http://www.iana.org/numbers.html
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
October 1998.
[RFC4020] Kompella, K. and A. Zinin, "Early IANA Allocation of
Standards Track Code Points", BCP 100, RFC 4020, February
2005.
Authors' Addresses
Tony Bates
Cisco Systems, Inc.
EMail: tbates@cisco.com
Ravi Chandra
Sonoa Systems
EMail: rchandra@sonoasystems.com
Dave Katz
Juniper Networks, Inc.
EMail: dkatz@juniper.net
Yakov Rekhter
Juniper Networks, Inc.
EMail: yakov@juniper.net
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 4760 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 January 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Bates, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC, FYI, BCP