Home   A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Sieve Email Filtering: Sieves and Display Directives in XML :: RFC5784








Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          N. Freed
Request for Comments: 5784                                      S. Vedam
Category: Standards Track                               Sun Microsystems
ISSN: 2070-1721                                               March 2010


      Sieve Email Filtering:  Sieves and Display Directives in XML

Abstract

   This document describes a way to represent Sieve email filtering
   language scripts in XML.  Representing Sieves in XML is intended not
   as an alternate storage format for Sieve but rather as a means to
   facilitate manipulation of scripts using XML tools.

   The XML representation also defines additional elements that have no
   counterparts in the regular Sieve language.  These elements are
   intended for use by graphical user interfaces and provide facilities
   for labeling or grouping sections of a script so they can be
   displayed more conveniently.  These elements are represented as
   specially structured comments in regular Sieve format.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5784.
















Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Conventions Used in This Document  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Grammatical Structure of Sieve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   4.  XML Representation of Sieve  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     4.1.  XML Display Directives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     4.2.  Structured Comments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     4.3.  Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   5.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   6.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   7.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     7.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     7.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
   Appendix A.  Extended Example  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
   Appendix B.  XML Schema for Sieves in XML  . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
   Appendix C.  Relax NG Schema for Sieves in XML . . . . . . . . . . 24
   Appendix D.  Stylesheet for Conversion from XML  . . . . . . . . . 26
   Appendix E.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

















Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


1.  Introduction

   Sieve [RFC5228] is a language for filtering email messages at or
   around the time of final delivery.  It is designed to be
   implementable on either a mail client or mail server.  It is meant to
   be extensible, simple, and independent of access protocol, mail
   architecture, and operating system, and it is intended to be
   manipulated by a variety of different user interfaces.

   Some user interface environments have extensive existing facilities
   for manipulating material represented in XML [XML].  While adding
   support for alternate data syntaxes may be possible in most if not
   all of these environments, it may not be particularly convenient to
   do so.  The obvious way to deal with this issue is to map Sieves into
   XML, possibly on a separate back-end system, manipulate the XML, and
   convert it back to normal Sieve format.

   The fact that conversion into and out of XML may be done as a
   separate operation on a different system argues strongly for defining
   a common XML representation for Sieve.  This way, different front-end
   user interfaces can be used with different back-end mapping and
   storage facilities.

   Another issue with the creation and manipulation of Sieve scripts by
   user interfaces is that the language is strictly focused on
   describing email filtering operations.  The language contains no
   mechanisms for indicating how a given script should be presented in a
   user interface.  Such information can be represented in XML very
   easily, so it makes sense to define a framework to do this as part of
   the XML format.  A structured comment convention is then used to
   retain this information when the script is converted to normal Sieve
   format.

   It should be noted, however, that the ability for different front
   ends to use the same mapping and storage facilities does not mean
   that the additional XML information produced by different front ends
   will interoperate.

   Various Sieve extensions have already been defined, e.g., [RFC5183],
   [RFC5229], [RFC5230], [RFC5231], [RFC5232], [RFC5233], [RFC5235],
   [RFC5293], and more are planned.  The set of extensions available
   varies from one implementation to the next and may even change as a
   result of configuration choices.  It is therefore essential that the
   XML representation of Sieve be able to accommodate Sieve extensions
   without requiring schema changes.  It is also desirable that Sieve
   extensions not require changes to the code that converts to and from
   the XML representation.




Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


   This specification defines an XML representation for Sieve scripts
   and explains how the conversion process to and from XML works.  The
   XML representation is capable of accommodating any future Sieve
   extension as long as the underlying Sieve grammar remains unchanged.
   Furthermore, code that converts from XML to the normal Sieve format
   requires no changes to accommodate extensions, while code used to
   convert from normal Sieve format to XML only requires changes when
   new control commands are added -- a rare event.  An XML Schema, Relax
   NG Schema, and a sample stylesheet to convert from XML format are
   also provided in the appendices.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

   The term "processor" is used throughout this document to refer to
   agents that convert Sieve to and from the XML representation.  The
   term "editor" refers to agents that operate on, possibly creating or
   modifying, Sieves in XML format.

3.  Grammatical Structure of Sieve

   The Sieve language is designed to be highly extensible without making
   any changes to the basic language syntax.  Accordingly, the syntax of
   Sieve, defined in Section 8 of [RFC5228], is entirely structural in
   nature and employs no reserved words of any sort.

   Structurally, a Sieve script consists of a series of commands.  Each
   command, in turn, consists of an identifier, zero or more arguments,
   an optional test or test-list, and finally an optional block
   containing another series of commands.  Commands are further broken
   down into controls and actions, although this distinction cannot be
   determined from the grammar.

   Some example Sieve controls are:

   stop;               <-- No arguments, test, or command block
   require "fileinto"; <-- Control with a single argument
   if true {stop;}     <-- Control with test and command block

   Some examples of Sieve actions are:

discard;            <-- Action with no arguments, test, or command block
fileinto "folder";  <-- Action with an argument





Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


   At the time of this writing, there are no controls defined that
   accept both arguments and a test.  Similarly, there are currently no
   defined actions that allow either a test or a command block.
   Nevertheless, the Sieve grammar allows such constructs to be defined
   by some future extension.

   A test consists of an identifier followed by zero or more arguments,
   then another test or test-list.  Unlike commands, tests cannot be
   followed by a command block.

   Here are some examples of Sieve tests.  Note that such tests have to
   appear as part of a command in order to be syntactically valid:

   true                <-- Test with no argument or subordinate test
   envelope "to" "me@example.com" <-- Test with several arguments
   header :is "from" "you@example.com" <-- Test with tagged argument

   Command or test arguments can be either string lists, whole numbers,
   or tags.  (Tags are simply identifiers preceded by a colon.)  Note
   that although the Sieve grammar treats single strings as a degenerate
   case of a string list, some tests or actions have arguments that can
   only be individual strings, not lists.

   Here is an example showing the use of both a test-list and a string
   list:

   if anyof (not exists ["From", "Date"],
             header :contains "from" "fool@example.edu") {
     discard;
   }

   Extensions can add new controls, actions, tests, or arguments to
   existing controls or actions.  Extensions have also changed how
   string content is interpreted, although this is not relevant to this
   specification.  However, it is especially important to note that so
   far, only one of the many defined Sieve extensions -- the
   foreverypart extension [RFC5703] -- has added new controls to the
   language.  It seems safe to assume that, due to their nature, future
   addition of controls will be relatively rare.

   Finally, comments are allowed between lexical elements in a Sieve
   script.  One important use case for comments is encoding meta-data
   about the script, a facility that is lacking in the Sieve language.
   Therefore, comments need to be preserved in the XML representation.







Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


4.  XML Representation of Sieve

   Sieve controls and actions are represented in XML as "control" or
   "action" elements, respectively.  The command's identifier appears as
   a name attribute on the element itself.  This is the only attribute
   allowed on controls and actions -- arguments, tests, test-lists, and
   nested command blocks are all represented as nested elements.  While
   naming the element after the control or action itself may seem like a
   better choice, doing so would result in extensions requiring frequent
   corresponding schema changes.

   The example Sieve controls shown in the previous section would be
   represented as these XML fragments:

    

    fileinto

    
     
    

   The example Sieve actions shown above would appear in XML as:

   
   folder

   The separation of controls from actions in the XML representation
   means that conversion from normal Sieve format to XML has to be able
   to distinguish between controls and actions.  This is easily done by
   maintaining a list of all known controls since experience indicates
   new controls are rarely added.  At the time of this writing, the list
   of defined controls consists of:

   1.  if [RFC5228],

   2.  stop [RFC5228],

   3.  require [RFC5228],

   4.  foreverypart [RFC5703], and

   5.  break [RFC5703].

   It should be noted that with this approach unknown controls will
   simply be treated as actions and can be passed back and forth between
   the two representations.  The treatment of a control as an action is




Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


   unlikely to cause other issues since knowledge of a control's
   language semantics is almost always required to take advantage of it.

   Tests are represented in the same basic way as controls and actions,
   that is, as a "test" element with a name attribute giving the test
   identifier.  For example, the following XML fragments show various
   types of tests:

   

   
     tome@example.com
   

   
     isfromyou@example.com
   

   String, number, and tag arguments are represented as "str", "num",
   and "tag" elements, respectively.  The actual string, number, or tag
   identifier appears as text inside the element.  None of these
   elements have any defined attributes.  Several examples of arguments
   have already appeared in the preceding control, action, and test
   examples.  Any whitespace in the str body content MUST be preserved
   by the processor.  Also, note that since strings and tags are
   represented as element text, any quotes or other syntactic elements
   required in the regular Sieve representation are dropped rather than
   being carried over into the XML.

   String list arguments are represented as a "list" element, which in
   turn contains one or more str elements.  Note that this allows the
   distinction between a single string and a string list containing a
   single string to be preserved.  This is not essential since a list
   containing a single string could simply be mapped to a string, but it
   seems prudent to maintain the distinction when mapping to and from
   XML.

   Nested command blocks appear as a series of control or action
   elements inside of an outer control or action element.  No block
   element is needed since an inner command block can only appear once
   and only after any arguments, tests, or test-lists.  For example:










Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


   
     
       
         
           FromDate
         
       
       
         contains
         from
         fool@example.edu
       
     
     
   

   Sieve comments are mapped to a special "comment" element in XML.
   Both hash and bracketed comments are mapped to the same construct so
   the distinction between the two is lost in XML.  XML comments are not
   used because some XML tools do not make it convenient to access
   comment nodes.

   Comments are allowed between commands and inside "test" elements.
   But comments aren't allowed directly inside commands -- due to
   limitations of XML Schema, special enclosing "preamble" and
   "postamble" elements are needed:

   
     
       Check to see if message should be discarded
     
     
       
         
           FromDate
         
       
       
         contains
         from
         fool@example.edu
       
     
     
     
       End of discard check
     
   



Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


4.1.  XML Display Directives

   Sometimes graphical user interfaces are a convenient way to provide
   Sieve management functions to users.  These interfaces typically
   summarize/annotate/group/display Sieve script(s) in an intuitive way
   for end users.

   To do this effectively, the graphical user interface may require
   additional information about the Sieve script itself.  That
   information or "meta-data" might include, but is not limited to, a
   Sieve name (identifying the current Sieve), whether the Sieve is
   enabled or disabled, and the order in which the parts of the Sieve
   are presented to the user.  The graphical user interface may also
   choose to provide mechanisms to allow the user to modify the script.

   It is often useful for a graphical user interface to group related
   Sieve script elements and provide an interface that displays these
   groups separately so they can be managed as a single object.  Some
   examples include Sieve statements that together provide vacation
   responders, blacklists/whitelists, and other types of filtering
   controls.

   Some advanced graphical user interfaces may even provide a natural
   language representation of a Sieve script and/or an advanced
   interface to present Sieve statements directly to the user.

   A graphical user interface may also choose to support only a subset
   of action commands in the Sieve language (and its extensions), and so
   a mechanism to indicate the extent of support and characterize the
   relationships between those supported action commands and the test
   (with its arguments) is immensely useful and probably required for
   clients that may not have complete knowledge of Sieve grammar and
   semantics.

   The Sieve language contains no mechanisms for indicating how a given
   script should be presented in a user interface.  The language also
   does not contain any specific mechanisms to represent other sorts of
   meta-data about the script.  Providing support for such meta-data as
   part of a Sieve script is currently totally implementation specific
   and is usually done by imposing some type of structure on comments.

   However, such information can be represented in XML very easily, so
   it makes sense to define a framework to do this as part of the XML
   format.  Implementations MAY choose to use structured comments to
   retain this information when the script is converted to normal Sieve
   format.





Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


   The sample schemata for the XML representation of Sieve allows XML in
   foreign namespaces to be inserted in the same places "comment"
   elements can appear in Sieve scripts.  This is the preferred means of
   including additional information.  Alternately, the schema defines
   two display directives -- displayblock and displaydata -- as
   containers for meta-data needed by graphical user interfaces.

   Editors MAY use displayblock, displaydata, and foreign namespaces to
   associate meta-data.  Some editors find it inconvenient to preserve
   this additional data during an editing session.  Editors MAY preserve
   this data during an editing session for compatibility with other
   editors.

   The displayblock element can be used to enclose any number of Sieve
   statements at any level.  It is semantically meaningless to the Sieve
   script itself.  It allows an arbitrary set of attributes.
   Implementations MAY use this to provide many simple, display-related
   meta-data for the Sieve such as Sieve identifier, group identifier,
   order of processing, etc.

   The displaydata element supports any number of arbitrary child
   elements.  Implementations MAY use this to represent complex data
   about that Sieve such as a natural language representation of Sieve
   or a way to provide the Sieve script directly.

4.2.  Structured Comments

   Since the XML representation is not intended as a storage format,
   there needs to be a way to preserve the additional information that
   can be included in the XML representation in the normal Sieve syntax.
   This is done through the use of three structured comment conventions:

   1.  XML content in other namespaces is placed in Sieve bracketed
       comments beginning with the string "/* [/" and ending with the
       string "/] */".

   2.  The content of displaydata elements is placed in Sieve bracketed
       comments beginning with the string "/* [|" and ending with the
       string "|] */".

   3.  The beginning of a displayblock element is mapped to a bracketed
       Sieve comment beginning with the string "/* [*", which then lists
       any displayblock attribute names and values in XML format.  The
       end of a displayblock element is mapped to a comment of the form
       "*] */".

   Processors MUST preserve the additional information allowed in the
   XML format and SHOULD use the structured comment format shown above.



Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


   Note: If "*/" is found in the XML content, when mapped into a
   comment, it would prematurely terminate that comment.  Escaping this
   sequence would often be inconvenient for processors.  Editors SHALL
   NOT include "*/" within displayblock, displaydata, or foreign markup.
   Processors MAY regard documents containing "*/" in foreign markup,
   displayblock, or displaydata as invalid.

4.3.  Validation

   A processor MAY validate documents against a schema, and it MAY
   reject any that do not conform.  For any document that a processor
   does not reject as invalid, any markup that the processor cannot
   understand by reference to this specification MAY be discarded.

   Note that example Relax NG and XML Schema are given in the appendices
   below.

5.  Security Considerations

   Any syntactically valid Sieve script can be represented in XML.
   Accordingly, all security considerations applicable to Sieve and any
   extensions used also apply to the XML representation.

   The use of XML carries its own security risks.  Section 7 of RFC 3470
   [RFC3470] discusses these risks.

   It is axiomatic that a Sieve editor must be trusted to do what the
   user specifies.  If XML formats are used, this trust necessarily must
   extend to the components involved in converting to and from XML
   format.

   Arbitrary data can be included using other namespaces or placed in
   the extensible displayblock and displaydata constructs defined in
   this specification, possibly including entire scripts and other
   executable content in languages other than Sieve.  Such material will
   necessarily have its own security considerations, which are beyond
   the scope of this document.

6.  IANA Considerations

   This section registers a new XML namespace per the procedures in RFC
   3688 [RFC3688].









Freed & Vedam                Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 5784             An XML Representation for Sieve          March 2010


   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:sieve

   Registrant Contact:  IETF Sieve working group
                        

   XML:

     BEGIN
     
     
     
     
       
       Sieve Namespace
     
     
       

Namespace for Sieve Language objects expressed in XML

urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:sieve

See RFC 5784.

END 7. References 7.1. Normative References [OASISRNC] Clark, J., "RELAX NG Compact Syntax", OASIS Committee Specification rnc, November 2002. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3470] Hollenbeck, S., Rose, M., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines for the Use of Extensible Markup Language (XML) within IETF Protocols", BCP 70, RFC 3470, January 2003. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. [RFC5228] Guenther, P. and T. Showalter, "Sieve: An Email Filtering Language", RFC 5228, January 2008. Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 [XML] Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Maler, E., and F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition)", W3C REC-xml-20081126, November 2008, . 7.2. Informative References [RFC5183] Freed, N., "Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension", RFC 5183, May 2008. [RFC5229] Homme, K., "Sieve Email Filtering: Variables Extension", RFC 5229, January 2008. [RFC5230] Showalter, T. and N. Freed, "Sieve Email Filtering: Vacation Extension", RFC 5230, January 2008. [RFC5231] Segmuller, W. and B. Leiba, "Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Extension", RFC 5231, January 2008. [RFC5232] Melnikov, A., "Sieve Email Filtering: Imap4flags Extension", RFC 5232, January 2008. [RFC5233] Murchison, K., "Sieve Email Filtering: Subaddress Extension", RFC 5233, January 2008. [RFC5235] Daboo, C., "Sieve Email Filtering: Spamtest and Virustest Extensions", RFC 5235, January 2008. [RFC5293] Degener, J. and P. Guenther, "Sieve Email Filtering: Editheader Extension", RFC 5293, August 2008. [RFC5703] Hansen, T. and C. Daboo, "Sieve Email Filtering: MIME Part Tests, Iteration, Extraction, Replacement, and Enclosure", RFC 5703, October 2009. Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Appendix A. Extended Example The example Sieve script given in Section 9 of [RFC5228] would be represented in XML as the following code component: Example Sieve Filter Declare any optional features or extensions used by the script fileinto Handle messages from known mailing lists. Move messages from IETF filter discussion list to filter mailbox. is Sender owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org filter move to "filter" mailbox Keep all messages to or from people in my company. domain is From To example.com Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Try and catch unsolicited email. If a message is not to me, or it contains a subject known to be spam, file it away. all contains To Cc Bcc me@example.com matches subject *make*money*fast* *university*dipl*mas* spam Move all other (non-company) mail to "personal" mailbox. personal Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 The same script could be annotated with graphical display hints in a variety of ways. Three possible code components that do this are: fileinto is Sender owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org filter domain is From To example.com all contains Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 16] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 To Cc Bcc me@example.com matches subject *make*money*fast* *university*dipl*mas* spam personal Note that since displayblock elements are semantically null as far as the script itself is concerned, they can be used to group structures like elsif and else that are tied to statements in other groups. Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 17] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 The representation of this script in regular Sieve syntax uses structured comments: require "fileinto"; /* [* name="File filter list mail" order="1" group="FILE_TO_FOLDER" enable="true" */ if header :is "Sender" "owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org" { fileinto "filter"; } /* *] */ /* [* name="Keep all company mail" order="2" group="KEEP_MESSAGE" enable="true" */ elsif address :domain :is [ "From", "To" ] "example.com" { keep; } /* *] */ /* [* name="File suspected spam" order="3" group="FILE_TO_FOLDER" enable="true" */ elsif anyof ( not ( address :all :contains [ "To", "Cc", "Bcc" ] "me@example.com" ), header :matches "subject" [ "*make*money*fast*", "*university*dipl*mas*" ] ) { fileinto "spam"; } /* *] */ /* [* name="File noncompany mail as personal" order="4" group="FILE_TO_FOLDER" enable="true" */ else { fileinto "personal"; } /* *] */ Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 18] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 A separate namespace can be used to embed text or structured information: If the email header "Sender" is owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org, then file it into the "filter" folder. Otherwise, if the address in the "From" or "To" has a domain that is "example.com", then keep it. Otherwise, messages meeting with any of these conditions: (1) None of the addresses in "To", "Cc", or "Bcc" contain the domain "example.com". (2) The "Subject" field matches the pattern *make*money*fast* or *university*dipl*mas*, then file it into the "spam" folder. If all else fails, then file the message in the "personal" folder. ... the actual Sieve script ... Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Alternately, displaydata elements can be used to accomplish the same thing: If the email header "Sender" is owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org, then file it into the "filter" folder. Otherwise, if the address in the "From" or "To" has a domain that is "example.com", then keep it. Otherwise, messages meeting with any of these conditions: (1) None of the addresses in "To","Cc", or "Bcc" contain the domain "example.com". (2) The "Subject" field matches the pattern *make*money*fast* or *university*dipl*mas*, then file it into the "spam" folder. If all else fails, then file the message in the "personal" folder. ... the actual Sieve script ... Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 20] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Again, structured comments are used to represent this in regular Sieve syntax: /* [| If the email header "Sender" is owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org, then file it into the "filter" folder. Otherwise, if the address in the "From" or "To" has a domain that is "example.com", then keep it. Otherwise, messages meeting with any of these conditions: (1) None of the addresses in "To","Cc", or "Bcc" contain the domain "example.com". (2) The "Subject" field matches the pattern *make*money*fast* or *university*dipl*mas*, then file it into the "spam" folder. If all else fails, then file the message in the "personal" folder. |] */ ... the actual Sieve script ... Appendix B. XML Schema for Sieves in XML This appendix is informative. The following code component is an XML Schema for the XML representation of Sieve scripts. Most of the elements employing a complex content model allow use of elements in other namespaces, subject to lax XML Schema validation rules. Additionally, displaydata elements can be used to encapsulate arbitrary XML content. Finally, displayblock elements can be used as a general-purpose grouping mechanism -- arbitrary attributes are allowed on displayblock elements. Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 21] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 22] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 23] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Appendix C. Relax NG Schema for Sieves in XML This appendix is informative. The following code component defines a Relax NG Schema using compact notation OASISRNC [OASISRNC] for the XML representation of Sieve scripts. Most of the elements employing a complex content model allow unrestricted use of elements in other namespaces. Additionally, displaydata elements can be used to encapsulate arbitrary XML content. Finally, displayblock elements can be used as a general-purpose grouping mechanism -- arbitrary attributes are allowed on displayblock elements. namespace sieve = "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:sieve" start = element sieve:sieve { ( control | action | displayblock | displaydata | comment | ext )* } comment = element sieve:comment { xsd:string } ambles = ( ( displaydata | comment | ext )* ), empty preamble = element sieve:preamble { ambles } postamble = element sieve:postamble { ambles } command = ( attribute name { xsd:token { Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 24] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 pattern = "[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*" } }, preamble?, ( str | num | \list | tag )*, test?, ( control | action | displayblock)*, postamble? ), empty control = element sieve:control { command } action = element sieve:action { command } test = element sieve:test { attribute name { xsd:token { pattern = "[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*" } }, ( str | num | \list | tag | comment | ext )*, test* } \list = element sieve:list { str+ } tag = element sieve:tag { xsd:token { pattern = "[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*" } } str = element sieve:str { xsd:string } num = element sieve:num { xsd:nonNegativeInteger } any = ( element * { any } | attribute * { text } | text )* ext = element * - sieve:* { any }* displayblock = element sieve:displayblock { ( control | action | displayblock | displaydata | comment | ext )*, attribute * { text }* } displaydata = element sieve:displaydata { any* } Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 25] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 Appendix D. Stylesheet for Conversion from XML This appendix is informative. The following code component is a stylesheet that can be used to convert the Sieve in XML representation to regular Sieve format. Content in other namespaces, displaydata, and displayblock elements are converted to structured comments as appropriate. \" Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 26] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 \\ { } ; ( , ) " " Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 28] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 G M K [ , ] : /* Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 29] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 */ /* [* */ /* *] */ /* [| |] */ /* [/ /] */ < /> < > </ > =" Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 31] RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010 " Appendix E. Acknowledgements The stylesheet copy mode code is loosely based on a sample code posted to the xsl-list list by Americo Albuquerque. Jari Arkko, Robert Burrell Donkin, Andrew McKeon, Alexey Melnikov, and Aaron Stone provided useful comments on the document. Authors' Addresses Ned Freed Sun Microsystems 800 Royal Oaks Monrovia, CA 91016-6347 USA Phone: +1 909 457 4293 EMail: ned.freed@mrochek.com Srinivas Saisatish Vedam Sun Microsystems Phone: +91 80669 27577 EMail: Srinivas.Sv@Sun.COM Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 32]

 

RFC, FYI, BCP