Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) F. Dijkstra
Request for Comments: 6453 SARA
Category: Informational R. Hughes-Jones
ISSN: 2070-1721 DANTE
December 2011
A URN Namespace for the Open Grid Forum (OGF)
Abstract
This document describes a URN (Uniform Resource Name) namespace that
is engineered by the Open Grid Forum (OGF) for naming persistent
resources.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6453.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Dijkstra & Hughes-Jones Informational [Page 1]
RFC 6453 URN Namespace for the OGF December 2011
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
1.1. Requirements Language ......................................2
2. URN Specification for "ogf" Namespace ID (NID) ..................3
2.1. Namespace ID ...............................................3
2.2. Registration Information ...................................3
2.3. Declared Registrant of the Namespace .......................3
2.4. Declaration of Syntactic Structure .........................3
2.5. Relevant Ancillary Documentation ...........................4
2.6. Identifier Uniqueness Considerations .......................4
2.7. Identifier Persistence Considerations ......................4
2.8. Process of Identifier Assignment ...........................5
2.9. Process of Identifier Resolution ...........................5
2.10. Rules for Lexical Equivalence .............................5
2.11. Conformance with URN Syntax ...............................5
2.12. Validation Mechanism ......................................6
2.13. Scope .....................................................6
3. Examples (Informative) ..........................................6
4. Namespace Considerations ........................................6
5. Community Considerations ........................................7
6. Security Considerations .........................................7
7. IANA Considerations .............................................7
8. Acknowledgements ................................................7
9. References ......................................................8
9.1. Normative References .......................................8
9.2. Informative References .....................................8
1. Introduction
The Open Grid Forum (OGF) is a standardisation development
organisation in the field of distributed computing. The OGF produces
documents such as working drafts, specifications, and schemata. For
more information, see is a unique subnamespace identifier for the
specification, and is a unique
identifier within the subnamespace identifier scope.
has the same syntax as a as defined in [RFC2141]:
SNID = ( ALPHA / DIGIT ) *31( ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" )
ALPHA and DIGIT are defined in Appendix B of [RFC5234].
The Technical Director at OGF (or their successors) assigns SNIDs.
Dijkstra & Hughes-Jones Informational [Page 3]
RFC 6453 URN Namespace for the OGF December 2011
The syntax of is dependent on the
and MUST be defined by a Grid Forum Document [GFD.1]. This
document does not pose any additional restrictions to the
other than what is defined in the NSS
syntax as defined by [RFC2141] or its successor:
SUBNAMESPACE-SPECIFIC-STRING = 1*
is defined in Section 2.2 of [RFC2141].
2.5. Relevant Ancillary Documentation
The Technical Director at OGF (or their successors) will keep a list
of assigned subnamespace identifiers and associated documentation at
part of URNs in the OGF hierarchy is case insensitive.
Thus, the MUST be case normalised before comparison.
The rules for lexical equivalence of the
part of URNs in the OGF hierarchy is
specific for each SNID and MUST be defined when a SNID is assigned by
the OGF Technical Director. These definitions MUST include
information about case sensitivity, and in the case of %-escaped
octets, MUST define the exact normalisation to be used (e.g.,
interpret as octet, interpret as UTF-8, specify type of Unicode
normalisation factor, etc.).
2.11. Conformance with URN Syntax
The intention of this document is to only restrict the syntax of the
. The syntax of the follows the
general syntax of a URN:
SUBNAMESPACE-SPECIFIC-STRING = 1*
Dijkstra & Hughes-Jones Informational [Page 5]
RFC 6453 URN Namespace for the OGF December 2011
Documents defining a subnamespace identifier SHOULD specify further
syntactic restrictions in . It is
RECOMMENDED that these documents forbid the assignment of URNs
containing characters in the set ("%", "/", "?", and "#")
as defined in [RFC2141]. This is in accordance with Section 2.2 of
[RFC3986].
For forward compatibility, it is RECOMMENDED that software
implementations that don't validate subnamespace-specific strings
validate the syntax according to the generic rules for validating
URIs, as defined in [RFC3986]. URIs may contain all characters
defined in , including the characters in
(albeit they have a special meaning), as well as the characters "&"
and "~".
2.12. Validation Mechanism
The validation mechanism of URNs in the OGF hierarchy is specific for
each SNID and SHOULD be defined when a SNID is assigned by the OGF
Technical Director.
URNs in the OGF hierarchy without an assigned SNID are considered to
be invalid.
2.13. Scope
Global URNs are relevant for the distributed computing community in
general, and the Open Grid Forum in particular.
3. Examples (Informative)
Since no subnamespace identifiers have been defined yet, no actual
examples can be given. Therefore, the following examples are not
guaranteed to be real or even syntactically correct.
Grid Forum Documents defining the "gfd" and "network" subnamespace
identifiers may give the following examples.
o urn:ogf:gfd:136
o urn:ogf:network:canarie.ca:kisti-uninett-glif-001
4. Namespace Considerations
The Open Grid Forum (OGF) is a standardisation development
organisation in the field of distributed computing.
Dijkstra & Hughes-Jones Informational [Page 6]
RFC 6453 URN Namespace for the OGF December 2011
The use of the OGF hierarchy is expected to be broad, including but
not limited to usage for:
o Grid Forum Documents
o XML (Extensible Markup Language) Schemata
o RDF (Resource Description Framework) Schemata
The Open Grid Forum is dedicated to openly publishing all technical
documentation related to URNs in the OGF hierarchy and allowing
unlimited distribution of these documents.
5. Community Considerations
Members of the distributed computing community will benefit from
persistent and globally unique identifiers for use in protocols
developed by the Open Grid Forum.
Practical use of the urn:ogf namespace has been detected, and a
formal registration will allow the Open Grid Forum to document this
usage and enforce technical review of current practices.
6. Security Considerations
There are no additional security considerations other than those
normally associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general,
which are described in [RFC1737], [RFC2141], and [RFC3406].
It is recommended that implementers check the OGF registry and
documentation [URN-OGF] before assuming that a given identifier is
valid or has a certain meaning.
7. IANA Considerations
IANA has registered the "ogf" namespace identifier (NID) with a
reference to this document in the "Formal URN Namespaces"
sub-registry [RFC3406] of the "Uniform Resource Names (URN)
Namespaces" registry [URN-NAMESPACES].
8. Acknowledgements
The template and useful examples from [RFC3406] formed the basis for
this document. The authors would like to thank Joel Replogle and
Andre Mersky for setting up the urn:ogf subnamespace registry.
Jeroen van der Ham, Peter Saint-Andre, and Mykyta Yevstifeyev
proofread this document and provided valuable feedback.
Dijkstra & Hughes-Jones Informational [Page 7]
RFC 6453 URN Namespace for the OGF December 2011
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[GFD.191] Dijkstra, F., Hughes-Jones, R., Newby, G., and J.
Replogle, "Procedure for Registration of Subnamespace
Identifiers in the URN:OGF Hierarchy", GFD 191,
December 2011, .
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2141] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, January 2005.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for
Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
January 2008.
9.2. Informative References
[GFD.1] Catlett, C., "GGF Document Series", GFD 1, April 2002,
.
[RFC1737] Sollins, K. and L. Masinter, "Functional Requirements for
Uniform Resource Names", RFC 1737, December 1994.
[RFC3406] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
"Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition
Mechanisms", BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002.
[URN-NAMESPACES]
IANA, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespaces",
RFC, FYI, BCP